[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140818091239.GD25495@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 11:12:39 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
pbonzini@...hat.com, mingo@...hat.com,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ulrich Obergfell <uobergfe@...hat.com>,
Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] watchdog: control hard lockup detection default
* Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com> wrote:
> From: Ulrich Obergfell <uobergfe@...hat.com>
>
> In some cases we don't want hard lockup detection enabled by default.
> An example is when running as a guest. Introduce
>
> watchdog_enable_hardlockup_detector(bool)
So, the name watchdog_enable_hardlockup_detector_enable(false)
is both too long and also really confusing (because first it
suggests enablement, then disables it), so I renamed it to
hardlockup_detector_set(), which allows two natural variants:
hardlockup_detector_set(false);
...
hardlockup_detector_set(true);
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists