linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.11 120/137] sparc64: Don't bark so loudly about 32-bit tasks generating 64-bit fault addresses.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1408354398-10226-121-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com>
Date:	Mon, 18 Aug 2014 10:33:01 +0100
From:	Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.11 120/137] sparc64: Don't bark so loudly about 32-bit tasks generating 64-bit fault addresses.

3.11.10.15 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>

commit e5c460f46ae7ee94831cb55cb980f942aa9e5a85 upstream.

This was found using Dave Jone's trinity tool.

When a user process which is 32-bit performs a load or a store, the
cpu chops off the top 32-bits of the effective address before
translating it.

This is because we run 32-bit tasks with the PSTATE_AM (address
masking) bit set.

We can't run the kernel with that bit set, so when the kernel accesses
userspace no address masking occurs.

Since a 32-bit process will have no mappings in that region we will
properly fault, so we don't try to handle this using access_ok(),
which can safely just be a NOP on sparc64.

Real faults from 32-bit processes should never generate such addresses
so a bug check was added long ago, and it barks in the logs if this
happens.

But it also barks when a kernel user access causes this condition, and
that _can_ happen.  For example, if a pointer passed into a system call
is "0xfffffffc" and the kernel access 4 bytes offset from that pointer.

Just handle such faults normally via the exception entries.

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
---
 arch/sparc/mm/fault_64.c | 16 +---------------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/sparc/mm/fault_64.c b/arch/sparc/mm/fault_64.c
index 1992fa04095f..ea83f82464da 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/mm/fault_64.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/mm/fault_64.c
@@ -280,18 +280,6 @@ static void noinline __kprobes bogus_32bit_fault_tpc(struct pt_regs *regs)
 	show_regs(regs);
 }

-static void noinline __kprobes bogus_32bit_fault_address(struct pt_regs *regs,
-							 unsigned long addr)
-{
-	static int times;
-
-	if (times++ < 10)
-		printk(KERN_ERR "FAULT[%s:%d]: 32-bit process "
-		       "reports 64-bit fault address [%lx]\n",
-		       current->comm, current->pid, addr);
-	show_regs(regs);
-}
-
 asmlinkage void __kprobes do_sparc64_fault(struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
 	struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
@@ -320,10 +308,8 @@ asmlinkage void __kprobes do_sparc64_fault(struct pt_regs *regs)
 				goto intr_or_no_mm;
 			}
 		}
-		if (unlikely((address >> 32) != 0)) {
-			bogus_32bit_fault_address(regs, address);
+		if (unlikely((address >> 32) != 0))
 			goto intr_or_no_mm;
-		}
 	}

 	if (regs->tstate & TSTATE_PRIV) {
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/