| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFrfXe0f6S0z8HUG2Mg29JVU39C0VOBimgKtq-HL47HZrA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 14:07:38 +0200
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To: "Fu, Zhonghui" <zhonghui.fu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>,
Chris Ball <chris@...ntf.net>,
"tgih.jun@...sung.com" <tgih.jun@...sung.com>,
Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>,
linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jackey Shen <jackey.shen@....com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: core: sdio: Fix unconditional wake_up_process() on
sdio thread
On 18 August 2014 05:04, Fu, Zhonghui <zhonghui.fu@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> From 21266249bbbaf9407c1e88cd5950e06ac88aeebf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Fu Zhonghui <zhonghui.fu@...ux.intel.com>
> Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 10:48:14 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] mmc: core: sdio: Fix unconditional wake_up_process() on sdio thread
>
> 781e989cf59 ("mmc: sdhci: convert to new SDIO IRQ handling") and
> bf3b5ec66bd ("mmc: sdio_irq: rework sdio irq handling") disabled
> the use of our own custom threaded IRQ handler, but left in an
> unconditional wake_up_process() on that handler at resume-time.
> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80151
>
> In addition, the check for MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ capability is added
> before enable sdio IRQ.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <chris@...ntf.net>
> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Fu Zhonghui <zhonghui.fu@...ux.intel.com>
Thanks! Applied for next and added a stable tag for v3.16+.
Kind regards
Uffe
> ---
> drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c | 12 ++++++++++--
> drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c
> index e636d9e..3fc40a7 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c
> @@ -992,8 +992,16 @@ static int mmc_sdio_resume(struct mmc_host *host)
> }
> }
>
> - if (!err && host->sdio_irqs)
> - wake_up_process(host->sdio_irq_thread);
> + if (!err && host->sdio_irqs) {
> + if (!(host->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_SDIO_IRQ_NOTHREAD)) {
> + wake_up_process(host->sdio_irq_thread);
> + } else if (host->caps & MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ) {
> + mmc_host_clk_hold(host);
> + host->ops->enable_sdio_irq(host, 1);
> + mmc_host_clk_release(host);
> + }
> + }
> +
> mmc_release_host(host);
>
> host->pm_flags &= ~MMC_PM_KEEP_POWER;
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c
> index 5cc13c8..696eca4 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c
> @@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ static int sdio_card_irq_get(struct mmc_card *card)
> host->sdio_irqs--;
> return err;
> }
> - } else {
> + } else if (host->caps & MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ) {
> mmc_host_clk_hold(host);
> host->ops->enable_sdio_irq(host, 1);
> mmc_host_clk_release(host);
> @@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ static int sdio_card_irq_put(struct mmc_card *card)
> if (!(host->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_SDIO_IRQ_NOTHREAD)) {
> atomic_set(&host->sdio_irq_thread_abort, 1);
> kthread_stop(host->sdio_irq_thread);
> - } else {
> + } else if (host->caps & MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ) {
> mmc_host_clk_hold(host);
> host->ops->enable_sdio_irq(host, 0);
> mmc_host_clk_release(host);
> -- 1.7.1
>
> On 2014/8/12 18:23, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> On 11 August 2014 07:49, Fu, Zhonghui <zhonghui.fu@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>>> From 6cee984e1d76ba0a3320430f8cf4318ab65fcf06 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>> From: Fu Zhonghui <zhonghui.fu@...ux.intel.com>
>>> Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 12:44:38 +0800
>>> Subject: [PATCH] mmc: core: sdio: Fix unconditional wake_up_process() on sdio thread
>>>
>>> 781e989cf59 ("mmc: sdhci: convert to new SDIO IRQ handling") and
>>> bf3b5ec66bd ("mmc: sdio_irq: rework sdio irq handling") disabled
>>> the use of our own custom threaded IRQ handler, but left in an
>>> unconditional wake_up_process() on that handler at resume-time.
>>> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80151
>>>
>>> In addition, the check for MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ capability is added
>>> before enable sdio IRQ.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <chris@...ntf.net>
>>> Signed-off-by: Fu Zhonghui <zhonghui.fu@...ux.intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
>>> drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c | 4 ++--
>>> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c
>>> index e636d9e..e04a540 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c
>>> @@ -992,8 +992,18 @@ static int mmc_sdio_resume(struct mmc_host *host)
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> - if (!err && host->sdio_irqs)
>>> - wake_up_process(host->sdio_irq_thread);
>>> + if (!err && host->sdio_irqs) {
>>> + if (!(host->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_SDIO_IRQ_NOTHREAD)) {
>>> + wake_up_process(host->sdio_irq_thread);
>>> + } else if (host->caps & MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ) {
>>> + mmc_release_host(host);
>> Why mmc_release_host() and the corresponding mmc_claim_host() below?
>> Those shouldn't be needed I think.
>
> You are right. These two functions shouldn't be invoked here. I made a new patch as above.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Zhonghui
>>
>>
>>> + mmc_host_clk_hold(host);
>>> + host->ops->enable_sdio_irq(host, 1);
>>> + mmc_host_clk_release(host);
>>> + mmc_claim_host(host);
>>> + }
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> mmc_release_host(host);
>>>
>>> host->pm_flags &= ~MMC_PM_KEEP_POWER;
>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c
>>> index 5cc13c8..696eca4 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c
>>> @@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ static int sdio_card_irq_get(struct mmc_card *card)
>>> host->sdio_irqs--;
>>> return err;
>>> }
>>> - } else {
>>> + } else if (host->caps & MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ) {
>>> mmc_host_clk_hold(host);
>>> host->ops->enable_sdio_irq(host, 1);
>>> mmc_host_clk_release(host);
>>> @@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ static int sdio_card_irq_put(struct mmc_card *card)
>>> if (!(host->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_SDIO_IRQ_NOTHREAD)) {
>>> atomic_set(&host->sdio_irq_thread_abort, 1);
>>> kthread_stop(host->sdio_irq_thread);
>>> - } else {
>>> + } else if (host->caps & MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ) {
>>> mmc_host_clk_hold(host);
>>> host->ops->enable_sdio_irq(host, 0);
>>> mmc_host_clk_release(host);
>>> -- 1.7.1
>>>
>> Thanks for working on this!
>>
>> Kind regards
>> Uffe
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists