[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJ5Y-ebhE4-9WpB9Z+PO80qZJ2G4+UeK9Q3gk00XL=oO89esbA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 11:04:53 -0400
From: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@...aro.org>
To: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Mike Turquette <mike.turquette@...aro.org>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
linux acpi <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, Patch Tracking <patches@...aro.org>,
Dirk Brandewie <dirk.brandewie@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/3] Experimental patchset for CPPC
Hi Len,
On 15 August 2014 18:11, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org> wrote:
> The Linux team at Intel did not implement ACPI CPPC support
> because we see no benefit to it over the native hardware interface on x86.
>
Thanks for sharing Intels observations. I had looked at the SDM [1]
and found all the CPPC MSRs. I suppose X86 will not use a majority of
it.
Cheers,
Ashwin
[1] - HWP section 14.4
http://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/manuals/64-ia-32-architectures-software-developer-vol-3b-part-2-manual.pdf
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists