[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1408375914.2741.1.camel@joe-AO725>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 08:31:54 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Majzerowicz-Jaszcz <cristos@...serv.org>,
jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: net: ethernet: intel: e1000: e1000_ethtool.c
coding style fixes
On Mon, 2014-08-18 at 08:29 -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> Doing any kind of pointer math on a void pointer is generally unsafe as
> it is an incomplete type. The only reason why it works in GCC is
> because GCC has a nonstandard extension that makes it report as having a
> size of 1.
I know. It's used in quite a few places in kernel code
so I believe it's now a base assumption for the kernel.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists