linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] Tegra xHCI support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <53F2381B.8020801@wwwdotorg.org>
Date:	Mon, 18 Aug 2014 11:30:03 -0600
From:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To:	Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@...omium.org>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
	linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org
CC:	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] Tegra xHCI support

On 08/18/2014 11:08 AM, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
> This series adds support for xHCI on NVIDIA Tegra SoCs.  This includes:
>   - adding a driver for the mailbox used to communicate with the xHCI
>     controller's firmware,
>   - extending the XUSB pad controller driver to support the USB PHY
>     types (UTMI, HSIC, and USB3), and
>   - adding a xHCI host-controller driver.

Can you please remind us what dependencies exist between the patches? In 
other words, is it possible to apply parts of the series to their usual 
subsystem branches, or does the whole thing need to go into a single 
topic branch in order to avoid compile-time problems, or run-time 
problems in features unrelated to the new functionality? Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/