[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53F246D4.7040807@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 19:32:52 +0100
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@....com>
CC: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
"graeme.gregory@...aro.org" <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
"grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@....com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>,
Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>,
Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com>,
Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Charles Garcia-Tobin <Charles.Garcia-Tobin@....com>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/18] ARM64 / ACPI: Parse FADT table to get PSCI flags
for PSCI init
On 04/08/14 16:28, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> There are two flags: PSCI_COMPLIANT and PSCI_USE_HVC. When set,
> the former signals to the OS that the hardware is PSCI compliant.
> The latter selects the appropriate conduit for PSCI calls by
> toggling between Hypervisor Calls (HVC) and Secure Monitor Calls
> (SMC).
>
> FADT table contains such information, parse FADT to get the flags
> for PSCI init. Since ACPI 5.1 doesn't support self defined PSCI
> function IDs, which means that only PSCI 0.2+ is supported in ACPI.
>
> At the same time, only ACPI 5.1 or higher verison supports PSCI,
> and FADT Major.Minor version was introduced in ACPI 5.1, so we
> will check the version and only parse FADT table with version >= 5.1.
>
> If firmware provides ACPI tables with ACPI version less than 5.1,
> OS will be messed up with those information and have no way to
> bring up secondery CPUs, so disable ACPI if we get an FADT table
> with version less that 5.1.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h | 12 ++++++
> arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c | 2 +
> 4 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h
> index 6400312..6e04868 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h
> @@ -19,6 +19,18 @@ extern int acpi_disabled;
> extern int acpi_noirq;
> extern int acpi_pci_disabled;
>
> +/* 1 to indicate PSCI 0.2+ is implemented */
> +static inline bool acpi_psci_present(void)
> +{
> + return !!(acpi_gbl_FADT.arm_boot_flags & ACPI_FADT_PSCI_COMPLIANT);
> +}
> +
> +/* 1 to indicate HVC must be used instead of SMC as the PSCI conduit */
> +static inline bool acpi_psci_use_hvc(void)
> +{
> + return !!(acpi_gbl_FADT.arm_boot_flags & ACPI_FADT_PSCI_USE_HVC);
> +}
> +
> static inline void disable_acpi(void)
> {
> acpi_disabled = 1;
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c
> index 9cf9127..69a315d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c
> @@ -11,6 +11,8 @@
> * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> */
>
> +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "ACPI: " fmt
> +
> #include <linux/init.h>
> #include <linux/acpi.h>
> #include <linux/cpumask.h>
> @@ -47,6 +49,26 @@ void __init __acpi_unmap_table(char *map, unsigned long size)
> early_memunmap(map, size);
> }
>
> +static int __init acpi_parse_fadt(struct acpi_table_header *table)
> +{
> + struct acpi_table_fadt *fadt = (struct acpi_table_fadt *)table;
> +
> + /*
> + * Revision in table header is the FADT Major version,
> + * and there is a minor version of FADT which was introduced
> + * by ACPI 5.1, we only deal with ACPI 5.1 or higher version
> + * to get arm boot flags, or we will disable ACPI.
> + */
> + if (table->revision < 5 || fadt->minor_revision < 1) {
&&
> + pr_info("FADT version is %d.%d, no PSCI support, should be 5.1 or higher\n",
> + table->revision, fadt->minor_revision);
> + disable_acpi();
Instead of disabling ACPI at multiple places in the boot sequence, can't
it be done once if acpi_boot_init failed ?
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * acpi_boot_table_init() called from setup_arch(), always.
> * 1. find RSDP and get its address, and then find XSDT
> @@ -68,6 +90,21 @@ void __init acpi_boot_table_init(void)
> }
> }
>
> +int __init acpi_boot_init(void)
> +{
> + int err = 0;
> +
> + /* If acpi_disabled, bail out */
> + if (acpi_disabled)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + err = acpi_table_parse(ACPI_SIG_FADT, acpi_parse_fadt);
> + if (err)
> + pr_err("Can't find FADT\n");
> +
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * acpi_suspend_lowlevel() - save kernel state and suspend.
> *
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c
> index 9e9798f..2ad2084 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c
> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
>
> #define pr_fmt(fmt) "psci: " fmt
>
> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> #include <linux/init.h>
> #include <linux/of.h>
> #include <linux/smp.h>
> @@ -231,6 +232,33 @@ static void psci_sys_poweroff(void)
> invoke_psci_fn(PSCI_0_2_FN_SYSTEM_OFF, 0, 0, 0);
> }
>
> +static void psci_0_2_set_functions(void)
> +{
> + pr_info("Using standard PSCI v0.2 function IDs\n");
> + psci_function_id[PSCI_FN_CPU_SUSPEND] = PSCI_0_2_FN64_CPU_SUSPEND;
> + psci_ops.cpu_suspend = psci_cpu_suspend;
> +
> + psci_function_id[PSCI_FN_CPU_OFF] = PSCI_0_2_FN_CPU_OFF;
> + psci_ops.cpu_off = psci_cpu_off;
> +
> + psci_function_id[PSCI_FN_CPU_ON] = PSCI_0_2_FN64_CPU_ON;
> + psci_ops.cpu_on = psci_cpu_on;
> +
> + psci_function_id[PSCI_FN_MIGRATE] = PSCI_0_2_FN64_MIGRATE;
> + psci_ops.migrate = psci_migrate;
> +
> + psci_function_id[PSCI_FN_AFFINITY_INFO] = PSCI_0_2_FN64_AFFINITY_INFO;
> + psci_ops.affinity_info = psci_affinity_info;
> +
> + psci_function_id[PSCI_FN_MIGRATE_INFO_TYPE] =
> + PSCI_0_2_FN_MIGRATE_INFO_TYPE;
> + psci_ops.migrate_info_type = psci_migrate_info_type;
> +
> + arm_pm_restart = psci_sys_reset;
> +
> + pm_power_off = psci_sys_poweroff;
> +}
> +
Nit: IMO may be you can move these refactoring as separate patch before
ACPI related changes ?
> /*
> * PSCI Function IDs for v0.2+ are well defined so use
> * standard values.
> @@ -264,29 +292,7 @@ static int psci_0_2_init(struct device_node *np)
> }
> }
>
> - pr_info("Using standard PSCI v0.2 function IDs\n");
> - psci_function_id[PSCI_FN_CPU_SUSPEND] = PSCI_0_2_FN64_CPU_SUSPEND;
> - psci_ops.cpu_suspend = psci_cpu_suspend;
> -
> - psci_function_id[PSCI_FN_CPU_OFF] = PSCI_0_2_FN_CPU_OFF;
> - psci_ops.cpu_off = psci_cpu_off;
> -
> - psci_function_id[PSCI_FN_CPU_ON] = PSCI_0_2_FN64_CPU_ON;
> - psci_ops.cpu_on = psci_cpu_on;
> -
> - psci_function_id[PSCI_FN_MIGRATE] = PSCI_0_2_FN64_MIGRATE;
> - psci_ops.migrate = psci_migrate;
> -
> - psci_function_id[PSCI_FN_AFFINITY_INFO] = PSCI_0_2_FN64_AFFINITY_INFO;
> - psci_ops.affinity_info = psci_affinity_info;
> -
> - psci_function_id[PSCI_FN_MIGRATE_INFO_TYPE] =
> - PSCI_0_2_FN_MIGRATE_INFO_TYPE;
> - psci_ops.migrate_info_type = psci_migrate_info_type;
> -
> - arm_pm_restart = psci_sys_reset;
> -
> - pm_power_off = psci_sys_poweroff;
> + psci_0_2_set_functions();
>
> out_put_node:
> of_node_put(np);
> @@ -333,6 +339,40 @@ out_put_node:
> return err;
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> +static int get_set_conduit_method_acpi(void)
> +{
> + pr_info("probing for conduit method from ACPI.\n");
> +
> + if (acpi_psci_use_hvc())
> + invoke_psci_fn = __invoke_psci_fn_hvc;
> + else
> + invoke_psci_fn = __invoke_psci_fn_smc;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/* We use PSCI 0.2+ when ACPI is deployed */
> +static int psci_0_2_init_acpi(void)
May be this can be renamed psci_acpi_init and called from setup directly
instead of calling from DT function with acpi_disabled check.
> +{
> + if (!acpi_psci_present()) {
> + pr_info("is not implemented in ACPI.\n");
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + }
> +
> + get_set_conduit_method_acpi();
> +
> + psci_0_2_set_functions();
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +#else
> +static inline int psci_0_2_init_acpi(void)
> +{
> + return -ENODEV;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> static const struct of_device_id psci_of_match[] __initconst = {
> { .compatible = "arm,psci", .data = psci_0_1_init},
> { .compatible = "arm,psci-0.2", .data = psci_0_2_init},
> @@ -345,6 +385,9 @@ int __init psci_init(void)
> const struct of_device_id *matched_np;
> psci_initcall_t init_fn;
>
> + if (!acpi_disabled)
> + return psci_0_2_init_acpi();
> +
As mentioned above you need not modify this.
> np = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, psci_of_match, &matched_np);
>
> if (!np)
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
> index 85c6326..dfc4e4f3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -395,6 +395,8 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
> efi_idmap_init();
>
> cpu_logical_map(0) = read_cpuid_mpidr() & MPIDR_HWID_BITMASK;
> + acpi_boot_init();
> +
Check for the return error here and disable ACPI once rather than at
multiple places all over.
> unflatten_device_tree();
>
> psci_init();
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists