[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53F25E72.4080205@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 22:13:38 +0200
From: Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
To: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>
CC: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephan van Schaik <stephan@...khronix.com>,
Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@...omium.org>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>,
Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com>,
Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>,
Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/10] ARM: dts: Fix MMC pinctrl for exynos5250-snow
Hi,
Am 18.08.2014 22:03, schrieb Kukjin Kim:
> On 08/18/14 13:48, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>> On 18.08.2014 20:37, Kukjin Kim wrote:
>>> On 08/01/14 11:26, Doug Anderson wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 9:54 PM, Andreas Färber<afaerber@...e.de>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> The pinctrl properties should be on the device directly and not on the
>>>>> slot sub-node.
>>>>>
>>>>> Reported-by: Doug Anderson<dianders@...omium.org>
>>>>> Cc: Jaehoon Chung<jh80.chung@...sung.com>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa<t.figa@...sung.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber<afaerber@...e.de>
>>>>
>>>> Let's land this one before Jaehoon's, since it was a hidden
>>>> functionality change in his patch. It will be an easy conflict to
>>>> resolve when his patch is applied.
>>>>
>>> Sounds good to me, I've applied this before Jaehoon's change.
>>>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson<dianders@...omium.org>
>>
>> Version 6 of this series has been already posted. However this
>> particular patch has not changed, so it's fine.
>>
> Oh, got it. Hope this and 2nd should be same with version 6 ;)
It is documented as such. :) Others did have changes, of course.
I've started looking into rebasing myself: beware that the smdk5250
cleanup has an additional conflict in the spi node (cs-gpios movement).
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git/commit/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts?h=v3.18-next/dt-samsung&id=e138d4333aa02a3daa12c04192bc5c842bffee74
Thanks,
Andreas
--
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists