[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140818215225.GI24600@localhost>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 22:52:25 +0100
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Liviu Dudau <liviu@...au.co.uk>
Cc: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Tanmay Inamdar <tinamdar@....com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>,
Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Suravee Suthikulanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>,
linux-pci <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Device Tree ML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
LAKML <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 03/12] PCI: Introduce helper functions to deal with
PCI I/O ranges.
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 10:34:46PM +0100, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 03:26:04PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 05:25:16PM +0100, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > > Some architectures do not have a simple view of the PCI I/O space
> > > and instead use a range of CPU addresses that map to bus addresses.
> > > For some architectures these ranges will be expressed by OF bindings
> > > in a device tree file.
> > >
> > > This patch introduces a pci_register_io_range() helper function with
> > > a generic implementation that can be used by such architectures to
> > > keep track of the I/O ranges described by the PCI bindings. If the
> > > PCI_IOBASE macro is not defined that signals lack of support for PCI
> > > and we return an error.
> > >
> > > In order to retrieve the CPU address associated with an I/O port, a
> > > new helper function pci_pio_to_address() is introduced. This will
> > > search in the list of ranges registered with pci_register_io_range()
> > > and return the CPU address that corresponds to the given port.
> > >
> > > Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>
> > > Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
> > > Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> > > Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/of/address.c | 95 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > include/linux/of_address.h | 2 +
> > > 2 files changed, 97 insertions(+)
> >
> > Actually, I think we moved too much code into drivers/of/. Is there
> > anything OF specific about this code to live here (apart from
> > OF_BAD_ADDR)? I think driver/pci/ more appropriate?
>
> I have no strong preference for one place vs the other. While this does
> not use any OF specific code, it should be called only from OF enabled
> code. So the relationship is not one of depending on of_* but on being
> dependent on.
In this case it's probably ok to keep them here for the time being.
I wonder whether it would also be useful for ACPI. But I have no idea
how ACPI would fit with the ACPI patches.
--
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists