[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1408403619.7460.1.camel@LTIRV-MCHAN1.corp.ad.broadcom.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 16:13:39 -0700
From: Michael Chan <mchan@...adcom.com>
To: Andreea-Cristina Bernat <bernat.ada@...il.com>
CC: <davem@...emloft.net>, <eddie.wai@...adcom.com>, <joe@...ches.com>,
<mingo@...nel.org>, <peterz@...radead.org>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] cnic: Replace rcu_dereference() with
rcu_access_pointer()
On Sun, 2014-08-17 at 13:12 +0300, Andreea-Cristina Bernat wrote:
> The "rcu_dereference()" calls are used directly in conditions.
> Since their return values are never dereferenced it is recommended to use
> "rcu_access_pointer()" instead of "rcu_dereference()".
> Therefore, this patch makes the replacements.
>
> The following Coccinelle semantic patch was used:
> @@
> @@
>
> (
> if(
> (<+...
> - rcu_dereference
> + rcu_access_pointer
> (...)
> ...+>)) {...}
> |
> while(
> (<+...
> - rcu_dereference
> + rcu_access_pointer
> (...)
> ...+>)) {...}
> )
>
> Signed-off-by: Andreea-Cristina Bernat <bernat.ada@...il.com>
Acked-by: Michael Chan <mchan@...adcom.com>
> ---
> v2: Modified subject line from
> "rcu: Replace rcu_dereference() with rcu_access_pointer()"
> to
> "cnic: Replace rcu_dereference() with rcu_access_pointer()",
> noted by David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/cnic.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/cnic.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/cnic.c
> index 8244e2b..dad9cb7 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/cnic.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/cnic.c
> @@ -381,7 +381,7 @@ static int cnic_iscsi_nl_msg_recv(struct cnic_dev *dev, u32 msg_type,
> break;
>
> rcu_read_lock();
> - if (!rcu_dereference(cp->ulp_ops[CNIC_ULP_L4])) {
> + if (!rcu_access_pointer(cp->ulp_ops[CNIC_ULP_L4])) {
> rc = -ENODEV;
> rcu_read_unlock();
> break;
> @@ -525,7 +525,7 @@ int cnic_unregister_driver(int ulp_type)
> list_for_each_entry(dev, &cnic_dev_list, list) {
> struct cnic_local *cp = dev->cnic_priv;
>
> - if (rcu_dereference(cp->ulp_ops[ulp_type])) {
> + if (rcu_access_pointer(cp->ulp_ops[ulp_type])) {
> pr_err("%s: Type %d still has devices registered\n",
> __func__, ulp_type);
> read_unlock(&cnic_dev_lock);
> @@ -573,7 +573,7 @@ static int cnic_register_device(struct cnic_dev *dev, int ulp_type,
> mutex_unlock(&cnic_lock);
> return -EAGAIN;
> }
> - if (rcu_dereference(cp->ulp_ops[ulp_type])) {
> + if (rcu_access_pointer(cp->ulp_ops[ulp_type])) {
> pr_err("%s: Type %d has already been registered to this device\n",
> __func__, ulp_type);
> mutex_unlock(&cnic_lock);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists