linux-kernel - Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 08/13 v2] f2fs: do checkpoint at f2fs_put

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 19 Aug 2014 09:11:30 -0700
From:	Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
To:	Chao Yu <chao2.yu@...sung.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 08/13 v2] f2fs: do checkpoint at	f2fs_put_super

On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 02:41:44PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> Hi Jaegeuk,
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaegeuk@...nel.org]
> > Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2014 5:58 AM
> > To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org;
> > linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 08/13 v2] f2fs: do checkpoint at f2fs_put_super
> > 
> > Change log from v1:
> >  o relocate F2FS_SET_SB_DIRT to avoid unnecessary checkpoints
> 
> In umount, we will encounter memory leak as we may skip releasing dirty inode
> when IO error occurred in cp. Why not just invoking release_dirty_inode directly
> in f2fs_put_super?

Correct. The release_dirty_inode call will be added to handle -EIO through the
following patch.

Ok, so I need to drop this patch and rewrite another patch to make the issue
clear.
Actually the patch will include:
-	if (sbi->s_dirty && get_pages(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_NODES))
+	if (sbi->s_dirty)

Thanks,

> 
> Thanks,
> Yu
> 
> > 
> > The generic_shutdown_super calls sync_filesystem, evict_inode, and then
> > f2fs_put_super. In f2fs_evict_inode, we remain some dirty inode information
> > so we should release them at f2fs_put_super.
> > 
> > But normally, it's more reasonable to set its superblock as dirty when
> > evict_inode is called.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
> > ---
> >  fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 1 +
> >  fs/f2fs/super.c      | 2 +-
> >  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> > index 7e1c13b..01e1796 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> > @@ -330,6 +330,7 @@ void add_dirty_inode(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t ino, int type)
> >  {
> >  	/* add new dirty ino entry into list */
> >  	__add_ino_entry(sbi, ino, type);
> > +	F2FS_SET_SB_DIRT(sbi);
> >  }
> > 
> >  void remove_dirty_inode(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t ino, int type)
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> > index 633315a..60e3554 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> > @@ -432,7 +432,7 @@ static void f2fs_put_super(struct super_block *sb)
> >  	stop_gc_thread(sbi);
> > 
> >  	/* We don't need to do checkpoint when it's clean */
> > -	if (sbi->s_dirty && get_pages(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_NODES))
> > +	if (sbi->s_dirty)
> >  		write_checkpoint(sbi, true);
> > 
> >  	iput(sbi->node_inode);
> > --
> > 1.8.5.2 (Apple Git-48)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> > Linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/