linux-kernel - Re: [UML] 3.16 build without optimization fails

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <E1XJpsx-0001oD-AE@www17.your-server.de>
Date:	Tue, 19 Aug 2014 22:19:58 +0200
From:	Thomas Meyer <thomas@...3r.de>
To:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [UML] 3.16 build without optimization fails

Hi.

Thanks for your answer.

There goes my plan to better understand an UML kernel lock up by using a debugger... Everything gets optimised out with -O2 :-(

Can you give an example function that relies on this GCC feature?

With kind regards
Thomas

Am 19.08.2014 22:06 schrieb Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu:
>
> On Tue, 19 Aug 2014 21:12:10 +0200, Thomas Meyer said: 
> > > Hi, 
> > > 
> > > the build with -O0 fails with: 
>
> > > bug or feature? 
> > > 
> > > any ideas? 
>
> Feature.  The kernel is *known* to not build with -O0, because that 
> disables *all* function inlining, and there's several functions that *have* 
> to be inlined in order to function properly (most notably, anything 
> that uses the gcc __builtin_return_address in a function that is expected 
> to be inlined).