linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] modinst: wrap long lines in order to enhance cmd_modules

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+r1ZhitXZXWWx6xsgiru8Z8PpMUqnrg=q4dKH4Sv4_wY9O13w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 19 Aug 2014 15:02:31 -0700
From:	Jim Davis <jim.epost@...il.com>
To:	Bertrand Jacquin <beber@...eeweb.net>
Cc:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] modinst: wrap long lines in order to enhance cmd_modules_install

On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 11:57 AM, Bertrand Jacquin <beber@...eeweb.net> wrote:
> Note: shouldn't we use 'install -D $(2)/$@ $@' instead of mkdir
> and cp ?

Will an install with -D in that sense always be available?  That's not
a flag in the original (BSD) program, and I did find one SPARC system
-- admittedly an ancient one -- where the install program had a -D
option but it did something else.  install isn't listed as a required
program in Documentation/Changes, for that matter.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/