linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] sgi-xp: Do not use BUG_ON(!spin_is

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 19 Aug 2014 06:37:46 +0000
From:	"Sharma, Sanjeev" <Sanjeev_Sharma@...tor.com>
To:	"Sharma, Sanjeev" <Sanjeev_Sharma@...tor.com>,
	"cpw@....com" <cpw@....com>,
	"robinmholt@...il.com" <robinmholt@...il.com>
CC:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] sgi-xp: Do not use BUG_ON(!spin_is_locked())

Hello Robin,

Who will merge the change in linux-next tree.

Regards
Sanjeev Sharma

-----Original Message-----
From: Sanjeev Sharma [mailto:sanjeev_sharma@...tor.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 1:05 PM
To: cpw@....com; robinmholt@...il.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Sharma, Sanjeev; Sharma, Sanjeev
Subject: [PATCH] sgi-xp: Do not use BUG_ON(!spin_is_locked())

on some architecture spin_is_locked() always return false in uniprocessor configuration and can therefore not be used with BUG_ON.it would be advise to replace with lockdep_assert_held().

Signed-off-by: Sanjeev Sharma <Sanjeev_Sharma@...tor.com>
---
 drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xpc_channel.c | 6 +++---
 drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xpc_sn2.c     | 2 +-
 drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xpc_uv.c      | 2 +-
 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xpc_channel.c b/drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xpc_channel.c
index 128d561..240fe5a 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xpc_channel.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xpc_channel.c
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ xpc_process_connect(struct xpc_channel *ch, unsigned long *irq_flags)  {
 	enum xp_retval ret;
 
-	DBUG_ON(!spin_is_locked(&ch->lock));
+	lockdep_assert_held(!spin_is_locked(&ch->lock));
 
 	if (!(ch->flags & XPC_C_OPENREQUEST) ||
 	    !(ch->flags & XPC_C_ROPENREQUEST)) { @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ xpc_process_disconnect(struct xpc_channel *ch, unsigned long *irq_flags)
 	struct xpc_partition *part = &xpc_partitions[ch->partid];
 	u32 channel_was_connected = (ch->flags & XPC_C_WASCONNECTED);
 
-	DBUG_ON(!spin_is_locked(&ch->lock));
+	lockdep_assert_held(!spin_is_locked(&ch->lock));
 
 	if (!(ch->flags & XPC_C_DISCONNECTING))
 		return;
@@ -758,7 +758,7 @@ xpc_disconnect_channel(const int line, struct xpc_channel *ch,  {
 	u32 channel_was_connected = (ch->flags & XPC_C_CONNECTED);
 
-	DBUG_ON(!spin_is_locked(&ch->lock));
+	lockdep_assert_held(!spin_is_locked(&ch->lock));
 
 	if (ch->flags & (XPC_C_DISCONNECTING | XPC_C_DISCONNECTED))
 		return;
diff --git a/drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xpc_sn2.c b/drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xpc_sn2.c index 7d71c04..f90ee26 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xpc_sn2.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xpc_sn2.c
@@ -1674,7 +1674,7 @@ xpc_teardown_msg_structures_sn2(struct xpc_channel *ch)  {
 	struct xpc_channel_sn2 *ch_sn2 = &ch->sn.sn2;
 
-	DBUG_ON(!spin_is_locked(&ch->lock));
+	lockdep_assert_held(!spin_is_locked(&ch->lock));
 
 	ch_sn2->remote_msgqueue_pa = 0;
 
diff --git a/drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xpc_uv.c b/drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xpc_uv.c index 95c8944..a349940 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xpc_uv.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xpc_uv.c
@@ -1183,7 +1183,7 @@ xpc_teardown_msg_structures_uv(struct xpc_channel *ch)  {
 	struct xpc_channel_uv *ch_uv = &ch->sn.uv;
 
-	DBUG_ON(!spin_is_locked(&ch->lock));
+	lockdep_assert_held(!spin_is_locked(&ch->lock));
 
 	kfree(ch_uv->cached_notify_gru_mq_desc);
 	ch_uv->cached_notify_gru_mq_desc = NULL;
--
1.7.11.7

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/