[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53F44815.9020309@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 09:02:45 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>,
Raghavendra KT <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vinod Chegu <chegu_vinod@...com>, Hui-Zhi <hui-zhi.zhao@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] KVM: VMX: abstract ple_window modifiers
Il 19/08/2014 22:35, Radim Krčmář ha scritto:
> They were almost identical and thus merged with a loathable macro.
>
> Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
> ---
> This solution is hopefully more acceptable than function pointers.
I think a little amount of duplication is not a problem.
Paolo
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++----------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> index a236a9f..c6cfb71 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> @@ -5694,42 +5694,27 @@ static int handle_invalid_guest_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> out:
> return ret;
> }
> -
> -static void grow_ple_window(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> -{
> - struct vcpu_vmx *vmx = to_vmx(vcpu);
> - int old = vmx->ple_window;
> - int new;
> -
> - if (ple_window_grow < 1)
> - new = ple_window;
> - else if (ple_window_grow < ple_window)
> - new = old * ple_window_grow;
> - else
> - new = old + ple_window_grow;
> -
> - vmx->ple_window = min(new, ple_window_max);
> -
> - trace_kvm_ple_window_grow(vcpu->vcpu_id, vmx->ple_window, old);
> +#define make_ple_window_modifier(type, oplt, opge, cmp, bound) \
> +static void type##_ple_window(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) \
> +{ \
> + struct vcpu_vmx *vmx = to_vmx(vcpu); \
> + int old = vmx->ple_window; \
> + int new; \
> +\
> + if (ple_window_##type < 1) \
> + new = ple_window; \
> + else if (ple_window_##type < ple_window) \
> + new = old oplt ple_window_##type; \
> + else \
> + new = old opge ple_window_##type; \
> +\
> + vmx->ple_window = cmp(new, bound); \
> +\
> + trace_kvm_ple_window_##type(vcpu->vcpu_id, vmx->ple_window, old); \
> }
>
> -static void shrink_ple_window(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> -{
> - struct vcpu_vmx *vmx = to_vmx(vcpu);
> - int old = vmx->ple_window;
> - int new;
> -
> - if (ple_window_shrink < 1)
> - new = ple_window;
> - else if (ple_window_shrink < ple_window)
> - new = old / ple_window_shrink;
> - else
> - new = old - ple_window_shrink;
> -
> - vmx->ple_window = max(new, ple_window);
> -
> - trace_kvm_ple_window_shrink(vcpu->vcpu_id, vmx->ple_window, old);
> -}
> +make_ple_window_modifier(grow, *, +, min, ple_window_max)
> +make_ple_window_modifier(shrink, /, -, max, ple_window)
>
> /*
> * Indicate a busy-waiting vcpu in spinlock. We do not enable the PAUSE
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists