[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53F46F24.9020800@collabora.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 11:49:24 +0200
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
CC: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <ch.naveen@...sung.com>,
Rahul Sharma <rahul.sharma@...sung.com>,
linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Yuvaraj Kumar C D <yuvaraj.cd@...sung.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] ARM: dts: Add vmmc and vqmmc supplies for Peach Pit
and Pi boards
Hello Doug,
On 08/19/2014 06:26 PM, Doug Anderson wrote:
>
> While your change is correct, I have a worry that it will break things
> if it's merged before some patches that Yuvaraj is working on.
>
> Specifically the problem on pit and pi (and any exynos5250 / 5420 /
> 5800 / ... boards using the built-in "card detect") is that the card
> detect line is on the same power rail as "vqmmc". That means you
> can't turn off vqmmc if you still need to be able to detect card
> insertions.
>
> ...but you can't turn off vmmc without turning off vqmmc, otherwise
> current will leak through the IO lines into the card, which is bad.
>
>
> Right now the SDMMC core will try to turn off power to the card at two times:
> 1. when the card is ejected
> 2. when it's trying to reset the card
>
>
> Obviously the first problem is a huge problem on exynos because it
> means that we won't be able to detect card insertions. ...but we
> still want to turn the power off from #2. To really fix the problem I
> think the core needs to be extended to treat the above as two separate
> cases.
>
Thanks a lot for the explanation, now I remember reading about this on
thread "[PATCH 2/3] mmc: dw_mmc: Dont cut off vqmmc and vmmc" [0] but
didn't think in the side effect when adding this patch...
>
> Your patch might work at the moment because I think dw_mmc doesn't
> actually try to turn off these rails with the main SDMMC core asks it
> to. ...but I still worry about merging them before Yuvaraj's changes
> are ready.
>
Agreed, I'll drop this patch and wait for Yuvaraj's series to land first.
Yuvaraj's "UHS support for dw_mmc driver" series that should contain the
change you are referring had the issue that when the tps65090 fet4 was
used as vmmc-supply, mmc_regulator_get_supply() was failing.
I posted a bunch of patches to fix that issue and there were already
merged on the relevant trees and shows on linux-next:
e1da8cd mmc: core: Use regulator_get_voltage() if OCR mask is empty.
a130548 ARM: dts: Improve Peach Pit and Pi power scheme
4f2352c regulator: tps65090: Set voltage for fixed regulators
26988ef regulator: core: Allow to get voltage count and list from parent
e303996 regulator: core: Get voltage from parent if not available
So hopefully his series have no blockers anymore.
>
> -Doug
>
Best regards,
Javier
[0]: https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org/msg27152.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists