linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] vhost: Add polling mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140820110515.GD17371@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 20 Aug 2014 13:05:15 +0200
From:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To:	Razya Ladelsky <RAZYA@...ibm.com>
Cc:	abel.gordon@...il.com, Alex Glikson <GLIKSON@...ibm.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eran Raichstein <ERANRA@...ibm.com>,
	Joel Nider <JOELN@...ibm.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	kvm-owner@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	Yossi Kuperman1 <YOSSIKU@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vhost: Add polling mode

On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 11:36:31AM +0300, Razya Ladelsky wrote:
> > That was just one example. There many other possibilities.  Either
> > actually make the systems load all host CPUs equally, or divide
> > throughput by host CPU.
> > 
> 
> The polling patch adds this capability to vhost, reducing costly exit 
> overhead when the vm is loaded.
> 
> In order to load the vm I ran netperf  with msg size of 256:
> 
> Without polling:  2480 Mbits/sec,  utilization: vm - 100%   vhost - 64% 
> With Polling: 4160 Mbits/sec,  utilization: vm - 100%   vhost - 100% 
> 
> Therefore, throughput/cpu without polling is 15.1, and 20.8 with polling.
> 

Can you please present results in a form that makes
it possible to see the effect on various configurations
and workloads?

Here's one example where this was done:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/8/14/495

You really should also provide data about your host
configuration (missing in the above link).

> My intention was to load vhost as close as possible to 100% utilization 
> without polling, in order to compare it to the polling utilization case 
> (where vhost is always 100%). 
> The best use case, of course, would be when the shared vhost thread work 
> (TBD) is integrated and then vhost will actually be using its polling 
> cycles to handle requests of multiple devices (even from multiple vms).
> 
> Thanks,
> Razya


-- 
MST
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/