[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53F48C8B.4020707@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 17:24:51 +0530
From: Chintan Pandya <cpandya@...eaurora.org>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] ksm: provide support to use deferrable timers
for scanner thread
Hi Hugh,
>>> + unsigned long enable;
>>> + int err;
>>> +
>>> + err = kstrtoul(buf, 10,&enable);
>>> + if (err< 0)
>>> + return err;
>>> + if (enable>= 1)
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>
>> I haven't studied the patch itself, I'm still worrying about the concept.
>> But this caught my eye just before hitting Send: I don't think we need
>> a tunable which only accepts the value 0 ;)
>
> Okay. I can correct this to accept any non-zero value. Is that okay ?
I missed that to reply earlier. This was suggested by Andrew. And I
think that is okay as displaying any non-zero value to user via this
knob may not be completely right.
>
>>
>>> + use_deferrable_timer = enable;
>
--
Chintan Pandya
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a
member of the Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists