[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <fc52b92969d39a8a36ea174ab93cf10bf4b8a2ce.1408535000.git.jslaby@suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 13:43:20 +0200
From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To: stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 3.12 057/104] sparc64: ldc_connect() should not return EINVAL when handshake is in progress.
From: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com>
3.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
===============
[ Upstream commit 4ec1b01029b4facb651b8ef70bc20a4be4cebc63 ]
The LDC handshake could have been asynchronously triggered
after ldc_bind() enables the ldc_rx() receive interrupt-handler
(and thus intercepts incoming control packets)
and before vio_port_up() calls ldc_connect(). If that is the case,
ldc_connect() should return 0 and let the state-machine
progress.
Signed-off-by: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com>
Acked-by: Karl Volz <karl.volz@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
---
arch/sparc/kernel/ldc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/ldc.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/ldc.c
index e01d75d40329..66dacd56bb10 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/ldc.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/ldc.c
@@ -1336,7 +1336,7 @@ int ldc_connect(struct ldc_channel *lp)
if (!(lp->flags & LDC_FLAG_ALLOCED_QUEUES) ||
!(lp->flags & LDC_FLAG_REGISTERED_QUEUES) ||
lp->hs_state != LDC_HS_OPEN)
- err = -EINVAL;
+ err = ((lp->hs_state > LDC_HS_OPEN) ? 0 : -EINVAL);
else
err = start_handshake(lp);
--
2.0.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists