[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140820141545.GA3242@krava.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 16:15:45 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>, ak@...ux.intel.com,
peterz@...radead.org, eranian@...gle.com, dev@...yps.com,
Michael Ellerman <michaele@....ibm.com>,
Anshuman Khandual <khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/14] Add support for parameterized events from sysfs
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 12:26:09AM -0700, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
> From: Cody P Schafer <dev@...yps.com>
>
> What this patchset does:
>
> - the first patch (override sysfs in tools/perf via SYSFS_PATH) was sent out
> previously, but needed a resend anyhow. Having it is useful for testing the
> later changes to tools/perf.
> - the second patch is a bugfix to the powerpc hv-24x7 code which was
> previously sent out, which is a good idea to have when testing these patches
> on POWER8 hardware.
>
> - document perf sysfs and the changes to add parameterized events
> - semi-notably: removes the growing list of specific POWER cpu events and
> begins documenting them generically, much like the docs for
> /sys/modules/MODULENAME do for modules.
> - tools/perf changes to support parameterized events
> - export some parameterized events from the powerpc pmus hv_24x7 and hv_gpci
>
> Description of "event parameters" from the documentation patch:
>
> Event parameters are a basic way for partial events to be specified in
> sysfs with per-event names given to the fields that need to be filled in
> when using a particular event.
>
> It is intended for supporting cases where the single 'cpu' parameter is
> insufficient. For example, POWER 8 has events for physical
> sockets/cores/cpus that are accessible from with virtual machines. To
> keep using the single 'cpu' parameter we'd need to perform a mapping
> between Linux's cpus and the physical machine's cpus (in this case
> Linux is running under a hypervisor). This isn't possible because
> bindings between our cpus and physical cpus may not be fixed, and we
> probably won't have a "cpu" on each physical cpu.
>
> Description of the sysfs contents when events are parameterized (copied from an
> included patch):
>
> Examples:
>
> domain=0x1,offset=0x8,starting_index=phys_cpu
>
> In the case of the last example, a value replacing "phys_cpu"
> would need to be provided by the user selecting the particular
> event. This is refered to as "event parameterization". All
> non-numerical values indicate an event parameter.
>
> Notes on how perf-list displays parameterized events (and how to use them,
> again culled from an included patch):
>
> PARAMETERIZED EVENTS
> --------------------
>
> Some pmu events listed by 'perf-list' will be displayed with '?' in
> them. For example:
>
> hv_gpci/dtbp_ptitc,phys_processor_idx=?/
>
> This means that when provided as an event, a value for
> phys_processor_idx must also be supplied. For example:
>
> perf stat -e 'hv_gpci/dtbp_ptitc,phys_processor_idx=0x2/' ...
hi,
is the reason for this to document this field for event
in "events/<event>" file?
Because once you have the field (phys_processor_idx) defined in
"formats/phys_processor_idx" you should be able to use it as in
your example:
perf stat -e 'hv_gpci/dtbp_ptitc,phys_processor_idx=0x2/'
without any changes
thanks,
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists