[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87ppfvqlcu.fsf@openvz.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 18:36:17 +0400
From: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@...nvz.org>
To: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] fault-inject: add ratelimit option
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 23:20:18 +0900, Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com> wrote:
> This looks a bit redundant. NULL pointer to "%pd" format produces
> "(null)" string, so this printk and if-else can be removed.
>
> Also, this message line is a bit longer than usual kernel message.
> Should we put '\n' after "forcing a failure."?
>
> This patch looks good to me. Please feel free to add my ACK.
Ok. Here is updated version.
View attachment "0001-fault-inject-add-ratelimit-option-v2.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (3837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists