lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFSsvmrZ3adzO_eNTc_ZWB3QGpfjPybj6O=x1-=a9=02pSG2qw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 20 Aug 2014 11:18:21 -0600
From:	Adam Duskett <aduskett@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: amd_mce.c redundant if check?

I have recently come upon this section of code in
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_amd.c that seems to be a redundant
unnecessary if check.


>From line 170 - 176:

if (tr->set_lvt_off) {
if (lvt_off_valid(tr->b, tr->lvt_off, lo, hi)) {
/* set new lvt offset */
hi &= ~MASK_LVTOFF_HI;
hi |= tr->lvt_off << 20;
}
}


This seems like it's not actually doing anything because it's setting
the same value that the bit-field already has to itself.

Any reason for this?


Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ