[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140820181406.GA6023@saruman.home>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 13:14:06 -0500
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
To: Vivek Gautam <gautam.vivek@...sung.com>
CC: <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <balbi@...com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<grant.likely@...aro.org>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<stern@...land.harvard.edu>, <jg1.han@...sung.com>,
<s.nawrocki@...sung.com>, <k.debski@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] usb-phy: samsung: Cleanup the unused drivers
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 07:53:53PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> - This series is based on 'usb-next' branch.
>
> Now that we have support for USB PHY controllers for Exynos SoC series,
> we are free to remove the older usb-phy support.
> In the process, we are removing the entire phy-samsung-usb3 driver, and
> besides that all support for Exynos4x and Exynos5 from phy-samsung-usb2
> driver.
>
> We have also removed the older USB-PHY support from ehci-exynos and ohci-exynos
> since those drivers now can use newer GENERIC-PHYs, and don't need the older
> USB-PHYs and related code anymore. These patches for ohci-exynos and ehci-exynos
> now replaces the older sent patch for phy sequence cleanup for them.[1]
>
> I have build-tested this series for exynos_defconfig and s3c64xx_defconfig,
> and have tested the EHCI and OHCI operations on smdk5250 board, but
> have not tested the actual working due to unavailability of S3C64XX
> board. So can someone please help me testing this series.
>
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/8/5/142
>
> Vivek Gautam (7):
> usb-phy: samsung-usb3: Remove older phy-samsung-usb3 driver
> usb-phy: samsung-usb2: Remove support for Exynos5250
> usb-phy: samsung-usb2: Remove support for Exynos4X12
> usb-phy: samsung-usb2: Remove support for Exynos4210
> usb-phy: samsung-usb2: Clean up to leave only S3C64XX support
> usb: host: ehci-exynos: Remove unnecessary usb-phy support
> usb: host: ohci-exynos: Remove unnecessary usb-phy support
some of these patches are still RFC, can you resend without RFC and all
proper Acks in place ? Also rebased on top of v3.17-rc1.
thanks
--
balbi
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists