[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53F4F2D2.2050600@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 12:11:14 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
CC: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] irqchip: gic: Allow gic_arch_extn hooks to call into
scheduler
On 08/17/14 17:17, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Aug 2014, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>
>> I have no problem with changing gic_raise_softirq() to use a different
>> lock, which gic_migrate_target(), and gic_set_affinity() can also use.
>> There's no need for horrid locking here, because the only thing we're
>> protecting is gic_map[] and the write to the register to trigger an
>> IPI - and nothing using gic_arch_extn has any business knowing about
>> SGIs.
>>
>> No need for these crappy sgi_map_lock() macros and all the ifdeffery.
> Those macros are there only to conditionalize the locking in
> gic_raise_softirq() because no locking what so ever is needed there when
> gic_migrate_target() is configured out. I suggested the macros to cut
> down on the #ifdefery in the code.
Ok I can resend with the sgi lock around the gic_cpu_map updating code.
Let's see how v5 goes.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists