[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53F502D7.9030403@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 14:19:35 -0600
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@...dia.com>, thierry.reding@...il.com
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, wni@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] of: Add nvidia,controller-id property to Tegra
I2C bindings
On 08/13/2014 06:41 AM, Mikko Perttunen wrote:
> Sometimes, hardware blocks want to issue requests to devices
> connected to I2C buses by itself. In such case, the bus the
> target device resides on must be configured into a register.
> For this purpose, each I2C controller has a defined ID known
> by the hardware. Add a property for these IDs to the device tree
> bindings, so that drivers can know what ID to write to a hardware
> register when configuring a block that sends I2C messages autonomously.
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/nvidia,tegra20-i2c.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/nvidia,tegra20-i2c.txt
> +Optional properties:
> +- nvidia,controller-id: ID of controller when referred to in
> + hardware registers.
I'd prefer to put this information into the thermal trip node, since
this represents what ID the PMC uses to communicate with the I2C
controller, and there's no absolute guarantee that multiple clients that
communicate directly with an I2C controller would use the same numbering
scheme.
If that doesn't work, can be at least name this nvidia,pmc-controller-id
or nvidia,id-in-pmc so that if there are different numbering schemes,
there's a clear path to represent this in different properties without
conflicting names?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists