linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] params: fix potential memory leak in add_sysfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1408570565.9484.4.camel@intel.com>
Date:	Wed, 20 Aug 2014 21:36:07 +0000
From:	"Woodhouse, David" <david.woodhouse@...el.com>
To:	"rusty@...tcorp.com.au" <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
CC:	"arjun024@...il.com" <arjun024@...il.com>,
	"torvalds@...ux-foundation.org" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"jg1.han@...sung.com" <jg1.han@...sung.com>,
	"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] params: fix potential memory leak in add_sysfs_param()

On Thu, 2014-08-21 at 06:19 +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Arjun Sreedharan <arjun024@...il.com> writes:
> > Do not leak memory when attrs is non NULL and
> > krealloc() fails. Without temporary variable,
> > reference to it is lost.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Arjun Sreedharan <arjun024@...il.com>
> 
> ...
> 
> >  	}
> > -	/* Despite looking like the typical realloc() bug, this is safe.
> > -	 * We *want* the old 'attrs' to be freed either way, and we'll store
> > -	 * the new one in the success case. */
> > -	attrs = krealloc(attrs, sizeof(new->grp.attrs[0])*(num+2), GFP_KERNEL);
> > -	if (!attrs) {
> > +
> > +	new_attrs = krealloc(attrs, sizeof(new->grp.attrs[0])*(num+2), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +	if (!new_attrs) {
> 
> I think that comment you deleted is pretty clear.  Is it wrong?

Yes, I think it's wrong.

I think I was under the impression that we shouldn't be freeing the old
'attrs' pointer on failure because it would live on in
{new,mk->mp}->grp.attrs and still be used. (Which I concede isn't
actually what the comment says, making it doubly wrong.)

I may have failed to notice that when this krealloc() fails, we actually
*free* the 'new' pointer and set mk->mp to NULL. Without freeing the
new->grp.attrs pointer. So it is indeed leaked. We *don't* need a
temporary variable for it though; we can find it.

In fact, I wonder if it's better to change the 'goto fail_free_new' in
the failure path here to instead do something like 'mk->mp = new; return
-ENOMEM;'. That way, the existing params would still be present and we'd
just have failed to add the *new* one. (And the leak wouldn't exist
because the 'attrs' pointer would live on as I originally thought.)

 
-- 
David Woodhouse                            Open Source Technology Centre
David.Woodhouse@...el.com                              Intel Corporation

Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/x-pkcs7-signature" (3437 bytes)