lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 20 Aug 2014 05:24:19 +0000
From:	"Sharma, Sanjeev" <Sanjeev_Sharma@...tor.com>
To:	Ryan Mallon <rmallon@...il.com>, "cpw@....com" <cpw@....com>,
	"robinmholt@...il.com" <robinmholt@...il.com>
CC:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] sgi-xp: Do not use BUG_ON(!spin_is_locked())

Opps ! Thanks for review comment. Just sent V2 updated patch.

Sanjeev Sharma

-----Original Message-----
From: Ryan Mallon [mailto:rmallon@...il.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 4:34 AM
To: Sharma, Sanjeev; cpw@....com; robinmholt@...il.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sgi-xp: Do not use BUG_ON(!spin_is_locked())

On 12/08/14 17:35, Sanjeev Sharma wrote:
> on some architecture spin_is_locked() always return false in 
> uniprocessor configuration and can therefore not be used with 
> BUG_ON.it would be advise to replace with lockdep_assert_held().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sanjeev Sharma <Sanjeev_Sharma@...tor.com>
> ---
>  drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xpc_channel.c | 6 +++---
>  drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xpc_sn2.c     | 2 +-
>  drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xpc_uv.c      | 2 +-
>  3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xpc_channel.c 
> b/drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xpc_channel.c
> index 128d561..240fe5a 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xpc_channel.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xpc_channel.c
> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ xpc_process_connect(struct xpc_channel *ch, unsigned 
> long *irq_flags)  {
>  	enum xp_retval ret;
>  
> -	DBUG_ON(!spin_is_locked(&ch->lock));
> +	lockdep_assert_held(!spin_is_locked(&ch->lock));

This is incorrect, and will break the build with CONFIG_LOCKDEP enabled.
You actually want:

	lockdep_assert_held(&ch->lock);

Same for the other instances.

~Ryan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists