[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACVXFVOR0mzMWo+iPtU8jUvYgH+non=hQ0XaP0Z1Fu0qiSbJNA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 13:44:48 +0800
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@...cle.com>,
Zach Brown <zab@...bo.net>, Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>,
Kent Overstreet <kmo@...erainc.com>,
"open list:AIO <linux-aio@...ck.org>, Linux FS Devel
<linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, Dave Chinner" <david@...morbit.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 5/9] block: loop: convert to blk-mq
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 4:50 AM, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> wrote:
>
>
> Reworked a bit more:
>
> http://git.kernel.dk/?p=linux-block.git;a=commit;h=a323185a761b9a54dc340d383695b4205ea258b6
One big problem of the commit is that it is basically a serialized workqueue
because of single &hctx->run_work, and per-req work_struct has to be
used for concurrent implementation. So looks the approach isn't flexible
enough compared with doing that in driver, or any idea about how to fix
that?
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists