[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANq1E4S-PJvJeORnf-GZxHQZxPLOZ-R+hv9mu0w2g2O6zdfuVw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 14:37:21 +0200
From: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/11] drivers: base: add new class "cpu" to group cpu devices
Hi
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com> wrote:
> On 21/08/14 12:20, David Herrmann wrote:
>> Why do we need a cpu-class if the same set of information is already
>> available on the cpu-bus? Furthermore, classes are deprecated anyway.
>> Everything you can do with a class can be solved with a bus. And we
>> already have a bus for cpus.
>>
>
> This was suggested[1] by GregKH. The main reason it was added is to
> reuse the device attributes rather than creating the raw kobjects.
>
> It helps to move few other cpu related subsystems using raw kobjects to
> the device attribute groups.
So the only reason to add a class is to get attributes registered
properly with the device? Just set dev->groups before calling
device_add()? This works just fine on buses, too.
Thanks
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists