[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53F5FF2D.4010406@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 10:16:13 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
CC: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, lkp@...org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [sched/fair] caeb178c60f: +252.0% cpuidle.C1-SNB.time, +3.1%
turbostat.Pkg_W
On 08/21/2014 10:01 AM, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> Hi Rik,
>
> FYI, we noticed the below changes on
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git sched/core
> commit caeb178c60f4f93f1b45c0bc056b5cf6d217b67f ("sched/fair: Make update_sd_pick_busiest() return 'true' on a busier sd")
>
> testbox/testcase/testparams: lkp-sb03/nepim/300s-100%-tcp6
Is this good or bad?
The numbers suggest the xfs + raid5 workload is doing around 2.4%
more IO to disk per second with this change in, and there is more
CPU idle time in the system...
For the tcp test, I see no throughput numbers, but I see more
idle time as well as more time in turbo mode, and more softirqs,
which could mean that more packets were handled.
Does the patch introduce any performance issues, or did it
simply trip up something in the statistics that your script
noticed?
> 743cb1ff191f00f caeb178c60f4f93f1b45c0bc0
> --------------- -------------------------
> 29718911 ±45% +329.5% 1.277e+08 ±10% cpuidle.C1E-SNB.time
> 861 ±34% +1590.4% 14564 ±31% cpuidle.C3-SNB.usage
> 1.65e+08 ±20% +175.4% 4.544e+08 ±15% cpuidle.C1-SNB.time
> 24 ±41% +247.6% 86 ±23% numa-numastat.node1.other_node
> 27717 ±11% +98.7% 55085 ± 6% softirqs.RCU
> 180767 ±11% +86.7% 337416 ±10% cpuidle.C7-SNB.usage
> 104591 ±14% +77.4% 185581 ±10% cpuidle.C1E-SNB.usage
> 384 ±10% +33.3% 512 ±11% slabinfo.kmem_cache.num_objs
> 384 ±10% +33.3% 512 ±11% slabinfo.kmem_cache.active_objs
> 494 ± 8% +25.9% 622 ± 9% slabinfo.kmem_cache_node.active_objs
> 512 ± 7% +25.0% 640 ± 8% slabinfo.kmem_cache_node.num_objs
> 83427 ± 6% +10.3% 92028 ± 5% meminfo.DirectMap4k
> 9508 ± 1% +21.3% 11534 ± 7% slabinfo.kmalloc-512.active_objs
> 9838 ± 1% +20.5% 11852 ± 6% slabinfo.kmalloc-512.num_objs
> 53997 ± 6% +11.1% 59981 ± 4% numa-meminfo.node1.Slab
> 2662 ± 3% -9.0% 2424 ± 3% slabinfo.kmalloc-96.active_objs
> 2710 ± 3% -8.6% 2478 ± 3% slabinfo.kmalloc-96.num_objs
> 921 ±41% +3577.7% 33901 ±14% time.involuntary_context_switches
> 2371 ± 2% +15.5% 2739 ± 2% vmstat.system.in
>
> testbox/testcase/testparams: lkp-sb03/nepim/300s-100%-tcp
>
> 743cb1ff191f00f caeb178c60f4f93f1b45c0bc0
> --------------- -------------------------
> 20657207 ±31% +358.2% 94650352 ±18% cpuidle.C1E-SNB.time
> 29718911 ±45% +329.5% 1.277e+08 ±10% cpuidle.C1E-SNB.time
> 861 ±34% +1590.4% 14564 ±31% cpuidle.C3-SNB.usage
> 0.05 ±46% +812.5% 0.44 ±34% turbostat.%c3
> 1.12e+08 ±25% +364.8% 5.207e+08 ±15% cpuidle.C1-SNB.time
> 1.65e+08 ±20% +175.4% 4.544e+08 ±15% cpuidle.C1-SNB.time
> 35 ±19% +105.6% 72 ±28% numa-numastat.node1.other_node
> 24 ±41% +247.6% 86 ±23% numa-numastat.node1.other_node
> 43 ±22% +86.2% 80 ±26% numa-vmstat.node0.nr_dirtied
> 24576 ± 6% +113.9% 52574 ± 1% softirqs.RCU
> 27717 ±11% +98.7% 55085 ± 6% softirqs.RCU
> 211533 ± 6% +58.4% 334990 ± 8% cpuidle.C7-SNB.usage
> 180767 ±11% +86.7% 337416 ±10% cpuidle.C7-SNB.usage
> 77739 ±13% +52.9% 118876 ±18% cpuidle.C1E-SNB.usage
> 104591 ±14% +77.4% 185581 ±10% cpuidle.C1E-SNB.usage
> 32.09 ±14% -24.8% 24.12 ±18% turbostat.%pc2
> 9.04 ± 6% +41.6% 12.80 ± 6% turbostat.%c1
> 384 ±10% +33.3% 512 ±11% slabinfo.kmem_cache.num_objs
> 384 ±10% +33.3% 512 ±11% slabinfo.kmem_cache.active_objs
> 494 ± 8% +25.9% 622 ± 9% slabinfo.kmem_cache_node.active_objs
> 512 ± 7% +25.0% 640 ± 8% slabinfo.kmem_cache_node.num_objs
> 379 ± 9% +16.7% 443 ± 7% numa-vmstat.node0.nr_page_table_pages
> 83427 ± 6% +10.3% 92028 ± 5% meminfo.DirectMap4k
> 1579 ± 6% -15.3% 1338 ± 7% numa-meminfo.node1.PageTables
> 394 ± 6% -15.1% 334 ± 7% numa-vmstat.node1.nr_page_table_pages
> 1509 ± 7% +16.6% 1760 ± 7% numa-meminfo.node0.PageTables
> 12681 ± 1% -17.3% 10482 ±14% numa-meminfo.node1.AnonPages
> 3169 ± 1% -17.3% 2620 ±14% numa-vmstat.node1.nr_anon_pages
> 10171 ± 3% +10.9% 11283 ± 3% slabinfo.kmalloc-512.active_objs
> 9508 ± 1% +21.3% 11534 ± 7% slabinfo.kmalloc-512.active_objs
> 10481 ± 3% +10.9% 11620 ± 3% slabinfo.kmalloc-512.num_objs
> 9838 ± 1% +20.5% 11852 ± 6% slabinfo.kmalloc-512.num_objs
> 53997 ± 6% +11.1% 59981 ± 4% numa-meminfo.node1.Slab
> 5072 ± 1% +11.6% 5662 ± 3% slabinfo.kmalloc-2048.num_objs
> 4974 ± 1% +11.6% 5551 ± 3% slabinfo.kmalloc-2048.active_objs
> 12824 ± 2% -16.1% 10754 ±14% numa-meminfo.node1.Active(anon)
> 3205 ± 2% -16.2% 2687 ±14% numa-vmstat.node1.nr_active_anon
> 2662 ± 3% -9.0% 2424 ± 3% slabinfo.kmalloc-96.active_objs
> 2710 ± 3% -8.6% 2478 ± 3% slabinfo.kmalloc-96.num_objs
> 15791 ± 1% +15.2% 18192 ± 9% numa-meminfo.node0.AnonPages
> 3949 ± 1% +15.2% 4549 ± 9% numa-vmstat.node0.nr_anon_pages
> 13669 ± 1% -7.5% 12645 ± 2% slabinfo.kmalloc-16.num_objs
> 662 ±23% +4718.6% 31918 ±12% time.involuntary_context_switches
> 921 ±41% +3577.7% 33901 ±14% time.involuntary_context_switches
> 2463 ± 1% +13.1% 2786 ± 3% vmstat.system.in
> 2371 ± 2% +15.5% 2739 ± 2% vmstat.system.in
> 49.40 ± 2% +4.8% 51.79 ± 2% turbostat.Cor_W
> 77.48 ± 1% +3.1% 79.91 ± 1% turbostat.Pkg_W
>
> testbox/testcase/testparams: lkp-st02/dd-write/5m-11HDD-RAID5-cfq-xfs-1dd
>
> 743cb1ff191f00f caeb178c60f4f93f1b45c0bc0
> --------------- -------------------------
> 18571 ± 7% +31.4% 24396 ± 4% proc-vmstat.pgscan_direct_normal
> 39983 ± 2% +38.3% 55286 ± 0% perf-stat.cpu-migrations
> 4193962 ± 2% +20.9% 5072009 ± 3% perf-stat.iTLB-load-misses
> 4.568e+09 ± 2% -17.2% 3.781e+09 ± 1% perf-stat.L1-icache-load-misses
> 1.762e+10 ± 0% -7.8% 1.625e+10 ± 1% perf-stat.cache-references
> 1.408e+09 ± 1% -6.6% 1.315e+09 ± 1% perf-stat.branch-load-misses
> 1.407e+09 ± 1% -6.5% 1.316e+09 ± 1% perf-stat.branch-misses
> 6.839e+09 ± 1% +5.0% 7.185e+09 ± 2% perf-stat.LLC-loads
> 1.558e+10 ± 0% +3.5% 1.612e+10 ± 1% perf-stat.L1-dcache-load-misses
> 1.318e+12 ± 0% +3.4% 1.363e+12 ± 0% perf-stat.L1-icache-loads
> 2.979e+10 ± 1% +2.4% 3.051e+10 ± 0% perf-stat.L1-dcache-store-misses
> 1.893e+11 ± 0% +2.5% 1.94e+11 ± 0% perf-stat.branch-instructions
> 2.298e+11 ± 0% +2.7% 2.361e+11 ± 0% perf-stat.L1-dcache-stores
> 1.016e+12 ± 0% +2.6% 1.042e+12 ± 0% perf-stat.instructions
> 1.892e+11 ± 0% +2.5% 1.94e+11 ± 0% perf-stat.branch-loads
> 3.71e+11 ± 0% +2.4% 3.799e+11 ± 0% perf-stat.dTLB-loads
> 3.711e+11 ± 0% +2.3% 3.798e+11 ± 0% perf-stat.L1-dcache-loads
> 325768 ± 0% +2.7% 334461 ± 0% vmstat.io.bo
> 8083 ± 0% +2.4% 8278 ± 0% iostat.sdf.wrqm/s
> 8083 ± 0% +2.4% 8278 ± 0% iostat.sdk.wrqm/s
> 8082 ± 0% +2.4% 8276 ± 0% iostat.sdg.wrqm/s
> 32615 ± 0% +2.4% 33398 ± 0% iostat.sdf.wkB/s
> 32617 ± 0% +2.4% 33401 ± 0% iostat.sdk.wkB/s
> 32612 ± 0% +2.4% 33393 ± 0% iostat.sdg.wkB/s
> 8083 ± 0% +2.4% 8277 ± 0% iostat.sdl.wrqm/s
> 8083 ± 0% +2.4% 8276 ± 0% iostat.sdi.wrqm/s
> 8082 ± 0% +2.4% 8277 ± 0% iostat.sdc.wrqm/s
> 32614 ± 0% +2.4% 33396 ± 0% iostat.sdl.wkB/s
> 8083 ± 0% +2.4% 8278 ± 0% iostat.sde.wrqm/s
> 8082 ± 0% +2.4% 8277 ± 0% iostat.sdh.wrqm/s
> 8083 ± 0% +2.4% 8277 ± 0% iostat.sdd.wrqm/s
> 32614 ± 0% +2.4% 33393 ± 0% iostat.sdi.wkB/s
> 32611 ± 0% +2.4% 33395 ± 0% iostat.sdc.wkB/s
> 325759 ± 0% +2.4% 333577 ± 0% iostat.md0.wkB/s
> 1274 ± 0% +2.4% 1305 ± 0% iostat.md0.w/s
> 8082 ± 0% +2.4% 8277 ± 0% iostat.sdb.wrqm/s
> 32618 ± 0% +2.4% 33398 ± 0% iostat.sde.wkB/s
> 32612 ± 0% +2.4% 33395 ± 0% iostat.sdh.wkB/s
> 32618 ± 0% +2.4% 33397 ± 0% iostat.sdd.wkB/s
> 8084 ± 0% +2.4% 8278 ± 0% iostat.sdj.wrqm/s
> 32611 ± 0% +2.4% 33396 ± 0% iostat.sdb.wkB/s
> 32618 ± 0% +2.4% 33400 ± 0% iostat.sdj.wkB/s
> 2.3e+11 ± 0% +2.5% 2.357e+11 ± 0% perf-stat.dTLB-stores
> 4898 ± 0% +2.1% 5003 ± 0% vmstat.system.cs
> 1.017e+12 ± 0% +2.4% 1.042e+12 ± 0% perf-stat.iTLB-loads
> 1518279 ± 0% +2.1% 1549457 ± 0% perf-stat.context-switches
> 1.456e+12 ± 0% +1.4% 1.476e+12 ± 0% perf-stat.cpu-cycles
> 1.456e+12 ± 0% +1.3% 1.475e+12 ± 0% perf-stat.ref-cycles
> 1.819e+11 ± 0% +1.3% 1.843e+11 ± 0% perf-stat.bus-cycles
>
> lkp-sb03 is a Sandy Bridge-EP server.
> Memory: 64G
> Architecture: x86_64
> CPU op-mode(s): 32-bit, 64-bit
> Byte Order: Little Endian
> CPU(s): 32
> On-line CPU(s) list: 0-31
> Thread(s) per core: 2
> Core(s) per socket: 8
> Socket(s): 2
> NUMA node(s): 2
> Vendor ID: GenuineIntel
> CPU family: 6
> Model: 45
> Stepping: 6
> CPU MHz: 3500.613
> BogoMIPS: 5391.16
> Virtualization: VT-x
> L1d cache: 32K
> L1i cache: 32K
> L2 cache: 256K
> L3 cache: 20480K
> NUMA node0 CPU(s): 0-7,16-23
> NUMA node1 CPU(s): 8-15,24-31
>
> lkp-st02 is Core2
> Memory: 8G
>
>
>
>
> time.involuntary_context_switches
>
> 40000 O+------------------------------------------------------------------+
> | O O O |
> 35000 ++O O O O O O |
> 30000 ++ O O O |
> | O O O |
> 25000 ++ O O |
> | |
> 20000 ++ |
> | |
> 15000 ++ |
> 10000 ++ |
> | |
> 5000 ++ |
> | .*. |
> 0 *+*--*-*-*-*--*-*-*-*--*-*-*-*--*-*-*--*-*-*-*--*---*-*--*-*-*-*--*-*
>
>
> [*] bisect-good sample
> [O] bisect-bad sample
>
>
> Disclaimer:
> Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided
> for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software
> design or configuration may affect actual performance.
>
> Thanks,
> Fengguang
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists