[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140821145242.GJ24407@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 09:52:42 -0500
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 20
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 12:34:40AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 13:53:56 -0500 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > >Are you sure about this? There's a bunch of updates to the tree
> > >including one that's supposed to have fixed the build failure on
> >PowerPC
> > >which haven't made it into the tree, was there a problem with the fetch
> > >perhaps? I just checked and cgit says I pushed 23 hours ago so it
> > >doesn't look like a problem with the push.
> >
> > I thought I checked, but I may have missed it, sorry. I will check again before the next linux-next.
> The fix appears to be there today, but I dont; think it was for the
> previous linux-next. Does it matter that I am currently in Chicago
> (despite what the date on this email says :-))? I guess I must have
> fetched your tree earlier than you may have expected.
Right, that's why I checked that the push really had been the day before
as I had expected before I mailed - I'm in Chicago too. Very odd.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists