lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 21 Aug 2014 09:52:42 -0500
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 20

On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 12:34:40AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 13:53:56 -0500 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:

> > >Are you sure about this?  There's a bunch of updates to the tree
> > >including one that's supposed to have fixed the build failure on
> >PowerPC
> > >which haven't made it into the tree, was there a problem with the fetch
> > >perhaps?  I just checked and cgit says I pushed 23 hours ago so it
> > >doesn't look like a problem with the push.
> > 
> > I thought I checked, but I may have missed it, sorry.  I will check again before the next linux-next.

> The fix appears to be there today, but I dont; think it was for the
> previous linux-next.  Does it matter that I am currently in Chicago
> (despite what the date on this email says :-))?  I guess I must have
> fetched your tree earlier than you may have expected.

Right, that's why I checked that the push really had been the day before
as I had expected before I mailed - I'm in Chicago too.  Very odd.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ