[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1408632926.20771.3.camel@jekeller-desk1.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 14:55:26 +0000
From: "Keller, Jacob E" <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
To: "eliezer.tamir@...ux.intel.com" <eliezer.tamir@...ux.intel.com>
CC: "hykim@...i.com" <hykim@...i.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"amirv@...lanox.com" <amirv@...lanox.com>,
"dmitry@...adcom.com" <dmitry@...adcom.com>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
"Duyck, Alexander H" <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>,
"jslaby@...e.cz" <jslaby@...e.cz>,
"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.12 078/104] ixgbe: fix qv_lock_napi call in
ixgbe_napi_disable_all
On Thu, 2014-08-21 at 13:03 +0300, Eliezer Tamir wrote:
> On 20/08/2014 14:43, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> > From: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
> >
> > 3.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>
> No objection, I am however unable to test this myself at the moment.
>
> I would suggest that someone takes a look at other drivers that support
> busypoll, to make sure that they don't have a similar issue.
>
> -Eliezer
This was tested and resolved an issue found in the net-next kernel at
the time this was made, so I'd say it's had a fair amount of testing :)
Thanks,
Jake
Powered by blists - more mailing lists