[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140821145923.GA23151@msilap.einon.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 15:59:23 +0100
From: Mark Einon <mark.einon@...il.com>
To: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] staging: et131x: Remove unnecessary i2c_wack variable
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 09:06:40AM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 6:18 AM, Mark Einon <mark.einon@...il.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi Fabio, thanks for the review.
> >
> > It's a space alignment of parameters to go with the previous change, to
> > keep wrapping consistent in the file:
> >
> > - while (i2c_wack) {
> > + while (1) {
> > if (pci_write_config_byte(pdev, LBCIF_CONTROL_REGISTER,
> > - LBCIF_CONTROL_LBCIF_ENABLE))
> > + LBCIF_CONTROL_LBCIF_ENABLE))
> >
> > So what are you saying - are you just commenting, document it, put it
> > in a seperate patch?
>
> Yes, it would be better if this part was part of a separate patch.
Ok, I'll remove the indenting changes and sned them in a future patch.
I'll submit a revised v2 of this one.
Cheers,
Mark
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists