linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 6/9] arm: Tell irq work about self IPI support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 21 Aug 2014 16:21:23 +0100
From:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Catalin Iacob <iacobcatalin@...il.com>,
	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 6/9] arm: Tell irq work about self IPI support

On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 04:52:54PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> ARM irq work IPI support depends on SMP support. That information is
> partly known at early boottime. Lets implement
> arch_irq_work_has_own_interrupt() accordingly.

Sorry, this makes no sense on its own.  As there's no context for this
to know whether it's an appropriate change or not, it would be
irresponsible fo me to provide an ack for something I don't understand.

-- 
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/