[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140821165002.GG20453@potion.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 18:50:03 +0200
From: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>,
Raghavendra KT <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vinod Chegu <chegu_vinod@...com>,
Hui-Zhi Zhao <hui-zhi.zhao@...com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Lisa Mitchell <lisa.mitchell@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] Dynamic Pause Loop Exiting window.
2014-08-21 18:30+0200, Paolo Bonzini:
> Il 21/08/2014 18:08, Radim Krčmář ha scritto:
> I'm not sure of the usefulness of patch 6, so I'm going to drop it.
> I'll keep it in my local junkyard branch in case it's going to be useful
> in some scenario I didn't think of.
I've been using it to benchmark different values, because it is more
convenient than reloading the module after shutting down guests.
(And easier to sell than writing to kernel memory.)
I don't think the additional code is worth it though.
> Patch 7 can be easily rebased, so no need to repost (and I might even
> squash it into patch 3, what do you think?).
Yeah, the core is already a huge patch, so it does look weird without
squashing. (No-one wants to rebase to that point anyway.)
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists