[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140821171726.GB27140@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 19:17:26 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, richard@....at,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kernel: signal: NULL ptr deref when killing process
On 08/21, David Howells wrote:
>
> Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> > David, any other reason why ->real_cred can be NULL ? (assuming that I
> > interpret this asm correctly).
>
> It should only be possible to see ->real_cred as being NULL after exit_creds()
> has been called from __put_task_struct() for a task that has finished
> construction.
Yes, thanks, this was my understanding...
> Is there a race between kill() and exit() brought on by the kill path only
> using the RCU read lock? This doesn't prevent ->real_cred from being
> modified, but it looks like this should, in combination with
> delayed_put_task_struct(), prevent it from being cleared.
Yes, rcu should protect us from both delayed_put_pid() and delayed_put_task().
Everything looks correct... And there are a lot of other similar users of
find_vpid/find_task_by_vpid/pid_task/etc under rcu, I can't recall any bug
in this area.
I am puzzled. Note also that ->signal == NULL. Will try to think more,
but so far I have no any idea.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists