linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] KVM: add kvm_arch_sched

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 21 Aug 2014 22:31:10 +0200
From:	Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
To:	Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
	Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>,
	Vinod Chegu <chegu_vinod@...com>,
	Hui-Zhi Zhao <hui-zhi.zhao@...com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
	Lisa Mitchell <lisa.mitchell@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] KVM: add kvm_arch_sched_in

2014-08-22 00:19+0530, Raghavendra K T:
> On 08/21/2014 09:38 PM, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> >Introduce preempt notifiers for architecture specific code.
> >Advantage over creating a new notifier in every arch is slightly simpler
> >code and guaranteed call order with respect to kvm_sched_in.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
> >---
> 
> Reviewed-by: Raghavendra KT <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> No surprise that ia64 doesn't show here :).

Oh, totally forgot about its predicted comeback ...
Paolo, do you want to fixup this?  (It removes double newline.)

diff --git a/arch/ia64/kvm/kvm-ia64.c b/arch/ia64/kvm/kvm-ia64.c
index 0729ba6..1630624 100644
--- a/arch/ia64/kvm/kvm-ia64.c
+++ b/arch/ia64/kvm/kvm-ia64.c
@@ -1468,6 +1468,9 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_uninit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	kfree(vcpu->arch.apic);
 }
 
+void kvm_arch_sched_in(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+}
 
 long kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl(struct file *filp,
 			 unsigned int ioctl, unsigned long arg)

>                                             and I also would have liked
> static inlines (as indicated by Paolo).

I'll send a patch that converts empty functions into static inlines,
maybe return-0s too, soon(ish).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/