linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] KVM: nVMX: nested TPR shadow/threshold emulation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140822084407.GA6610@kernel>
Date:	Fri, 22 Aug 2014 16:44:07 +0800
From:	Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc:	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
	Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>,
	Zhang Yang <yang.z.zhang@...el.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] KVM: nVMX: nested TPR shadow/threshold emulation

On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 10:36:07AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>Il 22/08/2014 01:30, Wanpeng Li ha scritto:
>> Maybe I misunderstand your comments "On real hardware you could point
>> the virtual-APIC page to an invalid address."
>> http://lists.openwall.net/linux-kernel/2014/08/07/344
>> 
>
>That referred to an address that doesn't correspond to RAM.  You can use
>addresses like these in a real processor.
>
>But the manual says that "if the “use TPR shadow” VM-execution control
>is 1, VM entry ensures that the virtual-APIC address is 4-KByte aligned"
>(24.6.8 Controls For APIC Virtualization).  This is the check that is
>missing.

Ok, thanks.

Regards,
Wanpeng Li 
>
>Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/