linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 1/4] irqchip: gic: Change irq type check when extension is present

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <53F724F5.3040004@arm.com>
Date:	Fri, 22 Aug 2014 12:09:41 +0100
From:	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
To:	"Joe.C" <srv_yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com>
CC:	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Pawel Moll <Pawel.Moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
	"Joe.C" <yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	Jonas Jensen <jonas.jensen@...il.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"srv_heupstream@...iatek.com" <srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>,
	"yingjoe.chen@...il.com" <yingjoe.chen@...il.com>,
	"hc.yen@...iatek.com" <hc.yen@...iatek.com>,
	"yh.chen@...iatek.com" <yh.chen@...iatek.com>,
	"nathan.chung@...iatek.com" <nathan.chung@...iatek.com>,
	"eddie.huang@...iatek.com" <eddie.huang@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 1/4] irqchip: gic: Change irq type check when
 extension is present

Hi Joe,

On 13/08/14 03:11, Joe.C wrote:
> From: "Joe.C" <yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com>
> 
> GIC supports the combination with external extensions. But this
> is not reflected in the checks of the interrupt type flag.
> This patch allows interrupt types other than the one supported by GIC,
> if an architecture extension is present and supports them.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joe.C <yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com>
> ---
>  drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
> index 57d165e..66485ab 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
> @@ -194,23 +194,32 @@ static int gic_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
>  	u32 confoff = (gicirq / 16) * 4;
>  	bool enabled = false;
>  	u32 val;
> +	int ret = 0;
>  
>  	/* Interrupt configuration for SGIs can't be changed */
>  	if (gicirq < 16)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	if (type != IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH && type != IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING)
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -
>  	raw_spin_lock(&irq_controller_lock);
>  
> -	if (gic_arch_extn.irq_set_type)
> -		gic_arch_extn.irq_set_type(d, type);
> +	if (gic_arch_extn.irq_set_type) {
> +		ret = gic_arch_extn.irq_set_type(d, type);
> +		if (ret)
> +			goto out;
> +	} else if (type != IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH &&
> +		type != IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING) {
> +			ret = -EINVAL;
> +			goto out;
> +	}
>  
>  	val = readl_relaxed(base + GIC_DIST_CONFIG + confoff);
> -	if (type == IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)
> +	/* Check for both edge and level here, so we can support GIC irq
> +	   polarity extension in gic_arch_extn.irq_set_type. If arch
> +	   doesn't support polarity extension, the check above will reject
> +	   improper type. */
> +	if (type & IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_MASK)
>  		val &= ~confmask;
> -	else if (type == IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING)
> +	else if (type & IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH)
>  		val |= confmask;
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -226,10 +235,10 @@ static int gic_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
>  
>  	if (enabled)
>  		writel_relaxed(enablemask, base + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_SET + enableoff);
> -
> +out:
>  	raw_spin_unlock(&irq_controller_lock);
>  
> -	return 0;
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  static int gic_retrigger(struct irq_data *d)
> 

You're really abusing the gic_arch_extn feature. I know this is
tempting, but this is pushing it a bit too far.

This feature exist for one particular reason: if your GIC is in the same
power-domain as the CPUs, it will go down as well when you suspend the
system, hence being enable to wake the CPU up. You then need a shadow
interrupt controller to take over. This is exactly why we call the hook
on every GIC-related operation.

Here, you're using it to program something that sits between the device
and the GIC. This is a separate block, with its own hardware
configuration, that modifies the interrupt signal. This should be
reflected in the device-tree and the code paths.

You can probably model this as a separate irqchip for the few interrupts
that require this, or have it configured at boot time (assuming the
configuration never changes).

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/