linux-kernel - Re: [Xen-devel] [V0 PATCH 1/2] AMD-PVH: set EFER.NX and EFER.SCE for the boot vcpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140822013904.GA20329@laptop.dumpdata.com>
Date:	Thu, 21 Aug 2014 21:39:04 -0400
From:	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To:	Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@...cle.com>
Cc:	boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, david.vrabel@...rix.com,
	xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [V0 PATCH 1/2] AMD-PVH: set EFER.NX and EFER.SCE for
 the boot vcpu

On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 07:16:39PM -0700, Mukesh Rathor wrote:
> On AMD, NX feature must be enabled in the efer for NX to be honored in
> the pte entries, otherwise protection fault. We also set SC for
> system calls to be enabled.

How come we don't need to do that for Intel (that is set the NX bit)?
Could you include the explanation here please?


> 
> Signed-off-by: Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@...cle.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c | 12 ++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
> index c0cb11f..4af512d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
> @@ -1499,6 +1499,17 @@ void __ref xen_pvh_secondary_vcpu_init(int cpu)
>  	xen_pvh_set_cr_flags(cpu);
>  }
>  
> +/* This is done in secondary_startup_64 for hvm guests. */
> +static void __init xen_configure_efer(void)
> +{
> +	u64 efer;
> +
> +	rdmsrl(MSR_EFER, efer);
> +	efer |= EFER_SCE;
> +	efer |= (cpuid_edx(0x80000001) & (1 << 20)) ? EFER_NX : 0;

Ahem? #defines for these magic values please?

Or could you use 'boot_cpu_has'?

> +	wrmsrl(MSR_EFER, efer);
> +}
> +
>  static void __init xen_pvh_early_guest_init(void)
>  {
>  	if (!xen_feature(XENFEAT_auto_translated_physmap))
> @@ -1508,6 +1519,7 @@ static void __init xen_pvh_early_guest_init(void)
>  		return;
>  
>  	xen_have_vector_callback = 1;
> +	xen_configure_efer();
>  	xen_pvh_set_cr_flags(0);
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@...ts.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/