[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140822141536.GA32051@ada>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 17:15:36 +0300
From: Andreea-Cristina Bernat <bernat.ada@...il.com>
To: a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, paulus@...ba.org, mingo@...hat.com,
acme@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH] kernel: events: callchain: Replace rcu_assign_pointer() with
RCU_INIT_POINTER()
The use of "rcu_assign_pointer()" is NULLing out the pointer.
According to RCU_INIT_POINTER()'s block comment:
"1. This use of RCU_INIT_POINTER() is NULLing out the pointer"
it is better to use it instead of rcu_assign_pointer() because it has a
smaller overhead.
The following Coccinelle semantic patch was used:
@@
@@
- rcu_assign_pointer
+ RCU_INIT_POINTER
(..., NULL)
Signed-off-by: Andreea-Cristina Bernat <bernat.ada@...il.com>
---
kernel/events/callchain.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/events/callchain.c b/kernel/events/callchain.c
index 97b67df..f2a88de 100644
--- a/kernel/events/callchain.c
+++ b/kernel/events/callchain.c
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ static void release_callchain_buffers(void)
struct callchain_cpus_entries *entries;
entries = callchain_cpus_entries;
- rcu_assign_pointer(callchain_cpus_entries, NULL);
+ RCU_INIT_POINTER(callchain_cpus_entries, NULL);
call_rcu(&entries->rcu_head, release_callchain_buffers_rcu);
}
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists