lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140822150307.GB29424@infradead.org>
Date:	Fri, 22 Aug 2014 08:03:07 -0700
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
Cc:	Arianna Avanzini <avanzini.arianna@...il.com>,
	konrad.wilk@...cle.com, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com,
	xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	bob.liu@...cle.com, felipe.franciosi@...rix.com, axboe@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/4] xen, blkfront: add support for the multi-queue
 block layer API

On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 01:25:34PM +0100, David Vrabel wrote:
> > +	spin_lock_irq(&info->io_lock);
> 
> Is this lock necessary?  Does the block layer serialise calls to the
> queue_rq op?

Calls to ->queue_rq are not serialized by the block layer.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ