[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140822150307.GB29424@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 08:03:07 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
Cc: Arianna Avanzini <avanzini.arianna@...il.com>,
konrad.wilk@...cle.com, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bob.liu@...cle.com, felipe.franciosi@...rix.com, axboe@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/4] xen, blkfront: add support for the multi-queue
block layer API
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 01:25:34PM +0100, David Vrabel wrote:
> > + spin_lock_irq(&info->io_lock);
>
> Is this lock necessary? Does the block layer serialise calls to the
> queue_rq op?
Calls to ->queue_rq are not serialized by the block layer.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists