linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] pmbus: ltc2978: add regulator gating

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1408221026340.30084@atx-linux-37>
Date:	Fri, 22 Aug 2014 10:30:58 -0500
From:	atull <atull@...nsource.altera.com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC:	<linux@...ck-us.net>, <jdelvare@...e.de>,
	<lm-sensors@...sensors.org>, <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <delicious.quinoa@...il.com>,
	<dinguyen@...nsource.altera.com>, <yvanderv@...nsource.altera.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pmbus: ltc2978: add regulator gating

On Fri, 22 Aug 2014, Mark Brown wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 05:21:26PM -0500, atull@...nsource.altera.com wrote:
> 
> > +config SENSORS_LTC2978_REGULATOR
> > +	boolean "Regulator support for LTC2974, LTC2978, LTC3880, and LTC3883"
> > +	default n
> 
> No need to say default n here, it's the default default.
> 
> > +	depends on SENSORS_LTC2978
> > +	select REGULATOR
> 
> I'd expect a depends here.

Hi Mark,

Thanks for the review.  I'll fix these two Kconfig issues.

> 
> > +#include <linux/regulator/driver.h>
> > +#include <linux/regulator/machine.h>
> 
> If you need machine.h that's suspicious...  why do you need it?

It was to define 'struct regulator_init_data' which I had hardwired here 
as you noted below.  Will fix.

> 
> > +static int ltc2978_write_pmbus_operation(struct regulator_dev *rdev, u8 value)
> > +{
> > +	struct device *dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev);
> > +	struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev->parent);
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	ret = pmbus_set_page(client, 0xff);
> > +	if (ret < 0)
> > +		return ret;
> > +
> > +	return i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client, PMBUS_OPERATION, value);
> > +}
> 
> This all looks very much like pmbus could use regmap and then the regmap
> helpers.  I'd not insist on it though.  What I would however suggest is
> that these functions should all be helpers which read the specific
> page, addresses and bits to write from the driver structure - I bet the
> code is going to be identical for most pmbus using regulators and so it
> makes sense to share it like we do with the generic regmap functions.
> 
> That means that any good practice can be deployed more easily and any
> API updates only need to update the helpers.
> 
> > +static struct regulator_init_data ltc2978_regulator_init = {
> > +	.constraints = {
> > +		.valid_ops_mask = REGULATOR_CHANGE_STATUS,
> > +	},
> > +};
> 
> You should not be forcing this on, you don't know what's safe on any
> given board.  Allow the board to specify constraints then it has
> control.
> 

Yes, this info should be from board info or device tree.  I'll fix this.

Thanks!

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/