[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=VS8e4Fs-j4CFvGYtvj58QwOk52gWh7AfnZcpswVRnDKA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 09:14:56 -0700
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>
Cc: Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>,
linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@...omium.org>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>,
Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com>,
Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] ARM: dts: Prepare node labels for exynos5250
Kukjin,
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 3:49 AM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com> wrote:
> Andreas Färber wrote:
>>
>> Allows them to be extended by reference.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
>> ---
>> v6 -> v7:
>> * Dropped uart* labels (Tomasz Figa)
>>
>> v6: Split off from Snow/SMDK cleanups (Doug Anderson)
>>
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi | 16 ++++++++--------
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi
>> index 492e1eff37bd..42eafd19cfb2 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi
>> @@ -218,7 +218,7 @@
>> clock-names = "fimg2d";
>> };
>>
>> - codec@...00000 {
>> + mfc: codec@...00000 {
>> compatible = "samsung,mfc-v6";
>> reg = <0x11000000 0x10000>;
>> interrupts = <0 96 0>;
>> @@ -227,7 +227,7 @@
>> clock-names = "mfc";
>> };
>>
>> - rtc@...E0000 {
>> + rtc: rtc@...E0000 {
>> clocks = <&clock CLK_RTC>;
>> clock-names = "rtc";
>> status = "disabled";
>> @@ -261,7 +261,7 @@
>> clock-names = "uart", "clk_uart_baud0";
>> };
>>
>> - sata@...F0000 {
>> + sata: sata@...F0000 {
>> compatible = "snps,dwc-ahci";
>> samsung,sata-freq = <66>;
>> reg = <0x122F0000 0x1ff>;
>> @@ -573,7 +573,7 @@
>> #phy-cells = <1>;
>> };
>>
>> - usb@...10000 {
>> + ehci: usb@...10000 {
>
> I'm not sure which one is recommended between above and "ehci: ehci@...10000 {"
My understanding is that more generic names should be used for node
names. AKA: "usb" and not "ehci". "mmc" and not "dwmmc".
In another thread I was pointed at ePAPR
<http://www.power.org/resources/downloads/Power_ePAPR_APPROVED_v1.0.pdf>:
The name of a node should be somewhat generic, reflecting the function
of the device and not its precise programming model.
>> - hdmi {
>> + hdmi: hdmi {
>
> Should be
>
> + hdmi: hdmi@...30000 { ?
Seems like that should be a followon patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists