lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0835B3720019904CB8F7AA43166CEEB2515F7E@RTITMBSV03.realtek.com.tw>
Date:	Fri, 22 Aug 2014 02:38:27 +0000
From:	Hayes Wang <hayeswang@...ltek.com>
To:	Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC:	nic_swsd <nic_swsd@...ltek.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next 3/4] r8152: remove clear_bp function

 Sergei Shtylyov [mailto:sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com] 
[...]
> >>      Why leave 2 empty lines? One is enough.
> 
> > The next patch would use another fucntion at the
> > same location. I skip removing the empty line and
> > re-adding it again. Is that better to do so? I would
> > resend the patches if the answer is yes.
> 
>     Sorry, I haven't looked at your next patch, too big for me. :-)

It's my mistake. I would avoid it next time. Thanks for your notice.
 
Best Regards,
Hayes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ