[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140822164825.GA1733@obsidianresearch.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 10:48:25 -0600
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
To: Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>
Cc: Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: zynq: DT: Add Ethernet phys
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 09:31:20AM -0700, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> > > - the marvell compatible strings are used in our vendor tree. They
> > > aren't used anywhere but in our vendor tree. I though keeping them is
> > > nice since it identifies the PHY fully. And in case that level of
> > > detail is needed at some point it is already there.
> >
> > DT is complex enough already, don't include useless compatible strings
> > in mainline - people will see and tend to blindly copy. Ideally your
> > vendor tree would use the standard property :|
>
> There are different opinions on this. I also heard to just add such
> strings, so in case this level of differentiation becomes necessary at
> some later point, it is already existing.
In some cases, yes, and they should be docuemented in the binding, of
course.
But there is already a standard compatible string format to uniquely
identify a phy, so in this case another string is not justified, and
just creates confusion about what is correct.
Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists