linux-kernel - [PATCH 04/15] percpu: remove @may_alloc from pcpu_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1408726399-4436-5-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
Date:	Fri, 22 Aug 2014 12:53:08 -0400
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, cl@...ux-foundation.org
Cc:	laijs@...fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	vgoyal@...hat.com, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 04/15] percpu: remove @may_alloc from pcpu_get_pages()

pcpu_get_pages() creates the temp pages array if not already allocated
and returns the pointer to it.  As the function is called from both
[de]population paths and depopulation can only happen after at least
one successful population, the param doesn't make any difference - the
allocation will always happen on the population path anyway.

Remove @may_alloc from pcpu_get_pages().  Also, add an lockdep
assertion pcpu_alloc_mutex instead of vaguely stating that the
exclusion is the caller's responsibility.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
---
 mm/percpu-vm.c | 15 ++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/percpu-vm.c b/mm/percpu-vm.c
index 47b47bf..d9e0b61 100644
--- a/mm/percpu-vm.c
+++ b/mm/percpu-vm.c
@@ -22,21 +22,22 @@ static struct page *pcpu_chunk_page(struct pcpu_chunk *chunk,
 /**
  * pcpu_get_pages - get temp pages array
  * @chunk: chunk of interest
- * @may_alloc: may allocate the array
  *
  * Returns pointer to array of pointers to struct page which can be indexed
- * with pcpu_page_idx().  Note that there is only one array and access
- * exclusion is the caller's responsibility.
+ * with pcpu_page_idx().  Note that there is only one array and accesses
+ * should be serialized by pcpu_alloc_mutex.
  *
  * RETURNS:
  * Pointer to temp pages array on success.
  */
-static struct page **pcpu_get_pages(struct pcpu_chunk *chunk, bool may_alloc)
+static struct page **pcpu_get_pages(struct pcpu_chunk *chunk_alloc)
 {
 	static struct page **pages;
 	size_t pages_size = pcpu_nr_units * pcpu_unit_pages * sizeof(pages[0]);
 
-	if (!pages && may_alloc)
+	lockdep_assert_held(&pcpu_alloc_mutex);
+
+	if (!pages)
 		pages = pcpu_mem_zalloc(pages_size);
 	return pages;
 }
@@ -287,7 +288,7 @@ static int pcpu_populate_chunk(struct pcpu_chunk *chunk, int off, int size)
 	/* need to allocate and map pages, this chunk can't be immutable */
 	WARN_ON(chunk->immutable);
 
-	pages = pcpu_get_pages(chunk, true);
+	pages = pcpu_get_pages(chunk);
 	if (!pages)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
@@ -358,7 +359,7 @@ static void pcpu_depopulate_chunk(struct pcpu_chunk *chunk, int off, int size)
 	 * successful population attempt so the temp pages array must
 	 * be available now.
 	 */
-	pages = pcpu_get_pages(chunk, false);
+	pages = pcpu_get_pages(chunk);
 	BUG_ON(!pages);
 
 	/* unmap and free */
-- 
1.9.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/