linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] i2c: rk3x: fix bug that cause transfer fails in master receive mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <53F79046.5020803@rock-chips.com>
Date:	Sat, 23 Aug 2014 02:47:34 +0800
From:	addy ke <addy.ke@...k-chips.com>
To:	dianders@...omium.org
CC:	wsa@...-dreams.de, max.schwarz@...ine.de, heiko@...ech.de,
	olof@...om.net, dmitry.torokhov@...il.com,
	sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, cf@...k-chips.com,
	xjq@...k-chips.com, huangtao@...k-chips.com, zyw@...k-chips.com,
	yzq@...k-chips.com, hj@...k-chips.com, kever.yang@...k-chips.com,
	hl@...k-chips.com, caesar.wang@...k-chips.com,
	zhengsq@...k-chips.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] i2c: rk3x: fix bug that cause transfer fails in master
 receive mode

> Addy,
> 
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Addy Ke <addy.ke@...k-chips.com> wrote:
>> In rk3x SOC, the I2C controller can receive/transmit up to 32 bytes data
>> in one chunk, so the size of data to be write/read to/from TXDATAx/RXDATAx
>> must be less than or equal 32 bytes at a time.
>>
>> Tested on rk3288-pinky board, elan receive 158 bytes data.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
> 
> You only need a "Suggested-by" if the entire patch was suggested by
> someone.  If someone provides you review feedback you don't need it.
> 
> Said another way: in this case Dmitry didn't suggest that you need to
> fix the i2c controller to transmit 32 byte chunks (he only provided
> review feedback), so you shouldn't say this was Suggested-by him.
> 
> You also had my reviewed-by on a previous version so you could keep it.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>

so, Do I need repost this patch or post a new one as patch v5?
> 
> 
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/