[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOiHx=kLfKLZA2Nv+dn87S50209DBXRj8OgZsywXQ0MoqTVA8A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2014 01:16:37 +0200
From: Jonas Gorski <jogo@...nwrt.org>
To: Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@...omium.org>
Cc: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Linux-MIPS <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>,
Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@...tec.com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
John Crispin <blogic@...nwrt.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Jayachandran C <jchandra@...adcom.com>,
Paul Burton <paul.burton@...tec.com>,
James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] MIPS: Move device-tree files to a common location
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 12:10 AM, Andrew Bresticker
<abrestic@...omium.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 1:57 PM, David Daney <ddaney.cavm@...il.com> wrote:
>> On 08/22/2014 01:42 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>>
>>> On Aug 21, 2014 3:05 PM, "Andrew Bresticker" <abrestic@...omium.org
>>> <mailto:abrestic@...omium.org>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > To be consistent with other architectures and to avoid unnecessary
>>> > makefile duplication, move all MIPS device-trees to arch/mips/boot/dts
>>> > and build them with a common makefile.
>>>
>>> I recall reading that the ARM organization for DTS files was a bit
>>> unfortunate and should have been something like:
>>>
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/<vendor>/
>>>
>>> Is this something we should do for the MIPS and update the other
>>> architectures to follow that scheme?
>>
>>
>> If we choose not to intermingle .dts files from all the vendors in a single
>> directory, why do anything at all? Currently the .dts files for a vendor
>> are nicely segregated with the rest of the vendors code under a single
>> directory.
>>
>> Personally I think things are fine as they are. Any common code remaining
>> in the Makefiles could be moved to the scripts directory for a smaller
>> change.
>
> Assuming we don't move them to a common location just to segregate
> them again, it makes MIPS consistent with every other architecture
> (not just ARM!) using DT. It also makes it easier to introduce common
> changes later on, like the 'dtbs' or 'dtbs_install' make targets.
I think having dts files under a predictable location is a good idea,
especially if it allows common code/targets as "dtbs".
Maybe a totally insane idea, but how this for having the cake and eating it too:
arch/mips/boot/dts/*.dts => dts files to be built along side the kernel as .dtbs
arch/mips/<mach>/*.dts => dts files built into the kernel
(the ../*.dts isn't meant as they should be in the top directory, just
somewhere in that sub tree)
Because I can see a use case where you want both. For example octeon
uses generic device tree boards to use as a basis if the bootloader
did not provide one/is too old, but maybe also provide dts files for
known boards, which shouldn't be included in the kernel binary itself.
And I would like to do a similar thing when I want to convert bcm63xx
to device tree, i.e. have dts files for supported boards, but also
include a "standard"/"fall-back" dts for each of the supported SoCs to
load if there is no dtb passed and the old board registration code is
used.
Jonas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists