[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53F8B48D.8060209@nod.at>
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2014 17:34:37 +0200
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To: Thorsten Knabe <linux@...rsten-knabe.de>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Meyer <thomas@...3r.de>,
Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] UML: UBD: Fix for processes stuck in D state forever
in UserModeLinux
Hi!
Am 23.08.2014 15:47, schrieb Thorsten Knabe:
> From: Thorsten Knabe <linux@...rsten-knabe.de>
>
> UML: UBD: Fix for processes stuck in D state forever in UserModeLinux.
>
> Starting with Linux 3.12 processes get stuck in D state forever in
> UserModeLinux under sync heavy workloads. This bug was introduced by
> commit 805f11a0d5 (um: ubd: Add REQ_FLUSH suppport).
> Fix bug by adding a check if FLUSH request was successfully submitted to
> the I/O thread and keeping the FLUSH request on the request queue on
> submission failures.
>
> Fixes: 805f11a0d5 (um: ubd: Add REQ_FLUSH suppport)
> Signed-off-by: Thorsten Knabe <linux@...rsten-knabe.de>
Thanks a lot for hunting this issue down.
> ---
> Patch applies to 3.16.1.
>
> diff --git a/arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c b/arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c
> index 3716e69..b7d2840 100644
> --- a/arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c
> +++ b/arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c
> @@ -1277,7 +1277,7 @@ static void do_ubd_request(struct request_queue *q)
>
> while(1){
> struct ubd *dev = q->queuedata;
> - if(dev->end_sg == 0){
> + if(dev->request == NULL){
Why do we need this specific change?
Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists